“Survivor” What-Ifs?: Cambodia

Quick, gotta get one of these out before the next season’s cast gets announced, which I’m betting will be in the next week or two at the time of this writing.  Better be a pretty simple change, preferably from a season I know pretty well… Yep, Cambodia will do nicely.  

Before I delve into the change we’ll be exploring, however, there are a couple of notes that should be given out.  Firstly, I myself did not TRULY come up with this scenario.  Credit for that goes to the “Survivor” YouTuber Peridiam, whose content I quite enjoy.  I’ll go into more detail when I discuss the change itself, but suffice to say, he informed me of something I did not previously know about in a recent video, and that led to the creation of this scenario you’ll be reading about.  Thus, it’s fair to say this is really his idea, rather than mine.  

The other note is the usual warning about SPOILERS!  Given the nature of this season as a second chance for non-winners, I’ll not only be discussing the outcome from Cambodia on for the sake of comparison, I’ll also be spoiling a lot of earlier seasons as well.  Thus, be wary should you read ahead.  It will not be spoiler safe.  

As you’ve now been duly warned, let us dive in.  

THE IMPACT

Doubtless all my readers remember the Final Four of “Survivor Cambodia”.  We’re left with two from San Juan del Sur, in Kelley and Jeremy, and two from Cagayan, in Spencer and Tasha.  They end up competing for immunity in “Simmotion”, quickly becoming an all-too common final challenge, and an underwhelming one at that in my opinion (for those not familiar, I don’t think the challenge is bad per se, but it feels too small yet too complex for a final immunity challenge.  Either give me some massive structure or a straight endurance challenge at the end.)  Jeremy ended up winning, thereby getting rid of pretty much all doubt that anyone but Kelley was going home at that point.  Granted, I don’t think most of us saw Spencer shooting himself in the foot quite as badly as he did, but still, pretty low tension.  

What you may NOT know, or at least I didn’t know, is that this was NOT the first time this challenge was run that season.  As Peridiam detailed in his “Top 10 Game-Ending Chokes in Survivor History” video, there was actually a practice round held before the actual challenge we saw.  And THAT challenge ended quite differently, with Kelley creaming the competition.  Only because a second round was needed did Jeremy win.  

So, what if that DOESN’T happen?  What if there’s not practice round, just one run of the challenge?  Well, assuming that’s the first run, the same as in our timeline, then Kelley wins, obviously.  I’d normally cover what’s next in the next section, but with how simple this change is, we can fudge the borders a bit.  With Kelley now immune, I’d say Jeremy becomes the obvious target.  He’d used his “shields” strategy well, but his shields were now gone.  Kelley was aware of how big of a threat he was, so I’d wager Tasha and Spencer were as well.  Couple that with Tasha and Spencer being allied on their original season, and Jeremy’s a goner here.  How does this change the season?  Find out in the next section.  

THE FALLOUT

Kelley wins.  Yeah, there’s not really a good, clever segue or lead-in to that.  It’s the obvious outcome.  Now, it’s fair to say that Kelley does not have the dominating performance that Jeremy does.  If nothing else, Savage is never voting for her to win under basically any circumstances.  But for the other votes?  At a minimum, I’d say she has Kass, Ciera, Abi-Maria, Kimmi, and Keith on lock.  That’s five out a needed six, and I’d say the likes of Joe, Kelly, and Jeremy lean in her favor as well.  Fishbach is a bit more up in the air, but I could see him being persuaded to vote for her in certain circumstances.  Point being, Kelley is easily the frontrunner to win.  The rest of the changes, however, come in the section I call…

THE LEGACY

For once in this off-season, we’ve got something far back enough in the timeline that it actually changes returnee seasons a bit.  Surprisingly, our first change is actually to “Survivor Game Changers” rather than “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, which Kelley was on in our timeline.  But no, I say the cast of Game Changers is itself changed, simply due to the fact of Jeremy not winning.  In our timeline, Jeremy was victorious one, with Kelley the good-but-robbed player.  In the timeline of a Kelley victory, those roles are reversed.  In our timeline, Kelley was asked to come back for Game Changers, but felt it was too soon.  As such, I don’t doubt that Jeremy is asked back here as well, but he always seemed a bit hungrier for the win, so barring some external life circumstance, I don’t see him saying “no”.  Much as I’d like to say he takes Varner’s place, I don’t see that happening.  

The good news is that the Varner/Zeke incident probably doesn’t happen as a result of this change, but it’s because Zeke, not Varner, gets replaced by Jeremy.  Zeke always seemed a bit “on the bubble” in terms of the cast; brought in more for being from a popular season than being super stand-out as a character his first time around.  Not dissing the guy, to be clear.  He seems like an awesome dude IRL, just not the biggest character from his season.  Add on that it’s always dicey bringing back cast members from a season that just wrapped filming, and I’d say Jeremy is more of a slam-dunk for this spot than anyone else.  Jeremy taking Zeke’s place changes that season in ways that would take a whole other blog to consider, so for now, we’ll leave that change here.  

It may not come first, but as Kelley’s win makes her ineligible for “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, someone must take her place.  I think the smart money would be on Chrissy Hoffbeck of “Survivor Heroes vs. Healers vs. Hustlers”.  They don’t quite fill the same demographic age-wise, but they are both women known for being good in challenges and overcoming great odds to make it near the end.  Decent enough parallels, and I’d say Chrissy was/is popular enough to merit a second shot.  Again, her place on the season changes too much to go over here, though I will say in the aggregate, I think she and David do worse than their placements in our timeline.  Part of the reason Kelley and David were “successful” (at least compared to Joe and Aubry) is that they worked against one another, thus diluting their threat level in the eyes of the fans.  Chrissy and David seem more on the same wavelength, and unless someone on Manu had the same hero-worship of Chrissy that Lauren had of Kelley, they do worse.  

This, then, brings us to “Survivor Winners at War”, where I have no doubt Kelley is brought back.  Popular winner from a popular season?  Yeah, she’s a shoe-in, probably taking Michele’s spot given how controversial the latter’s win was.  Shame, since it means we’re deprived of the Michele renaissance we got in our timeline, but these things happen.  No Jeremy on Winners at War also means we need a replacement for him.  As per usual with these blogs, I’m sticking with the safe choice of Mike Holloway from “Survivor Worlds Apart” getting the slot.  The man made it far in casting in our timeline, only getting cut due to spots just not being available.  One becomes available?  Production takes him in a heartbeat.  

I mentioned Kelley being a popular winner from a popular season, and surprise surprise, I meant it.  Cambodia is hardly reviled in our timeline, with only those who strongly favor character over strategy having much negative to say about it.  Kelley’s win doesn’t change the validity of that criticism, but I don’t see her hurting the legacy of the season any more than Jeremy’s win does in our timeline.  If anything, the season is an even bigger deal than in our timeline.  We’ll rightly laud Jeremy for playing a smart game, but in terms of the show, it wasn’t a particularly “flashy” win.  Kelley, in contrast, has the “Wentworth, will not count” as the iconic moment of the season.  Even in our timeline, I’d say it’s remembered as the highlight of the season.  As the crux of a winner’s story?  Yeah, it’s one for the history books.  There’s also just the fact that Kelley perhaps more than anyone else on the season, exemplifies the idea of the “second chance”.  She was tied for earliest boot on the season with Kimmi, and then she comes back and wins?  That’s an arc you can’t write, and it’s amazing to watch when it happens.  

As a final, random change this makes to the timeline, of all people, Drew Christy of “Survivor San Juan del Sur” is oddly given a bit more credit than in our timeline.  Don’t misunderstand, he’s still by and large the butt of the joke with just how much the edit dunks on him and his decisions throughout his boot episode.  “The Fall of Drew Christy” is easily one of the funniest things to come out of modern “Survivor”.  But now, with a Kelley win?  People look back on his out-of-nowhere quest to get rid of her, to the point of throwing a challenge just to eliminate her, and think “Yeah, this guy’s an idiot in his execution, but maybe he was on to something with the general idea.”  Man, that’s a weird timeline to think about.  

Speaking of weird timelines, thanks for following this one!  Always appreciate people taking the time to peruse my weird ramblings.  To help ensure I have more of them, let me know down in the comments what you’d like me to examine next!  The general guidelines for what sorts of submissions will be considered are listed below.  

1. One Change Only: This can’t be a whole bunch of things or multiple things going another way to alter the course of a season.  This must be one singular event that alters the season in some way.  Cascade effects, where one change naturally leads to another, are ok, but they have to be natural and logical.  As an example, Shii-Ann not flipping and Chuay Gahn losing the final 10 immunity challenge on “Survivor Thailand” would definitely change things, but those are two independent changes that need to happen, and therefore not appropriate for this blog.  I should also mention that the change has to be an EVENT, not a play style.  Yes, “Survivor Heroes vs. Villains” probably goes much differently if Russell Hantz (“Survivor Samoa”) isn’t an asshole to everyone, but apart from that never happening, it’s a change in overall play style, not a single moment.  It’s also, as I say, implausible, which leads to my next ground rule…

2. The Change Must Be Realistic: An unlikely change is ok, but it has to be something that COULD have happened, or it’s not worth writing about.  Yes, Fang winning the first immunity challenge on “Survivor Gabon” would drastically change the season.  Would it ever happen?  No.  So there’s no point in writing about it.  

3. The Change Must Have An Impact: By this, I mean the change has to actually alter the season in some significant way.  Simply changing up the boot order is not enough.  Someone new has to win, the perception of the season has to change, or both.  As an example, I originally planned to do a blog on “Survivor Heroes vs. Villains”, with a timeline where Candice didn’t flip at the final 9.  I thought this could lead to a Heroes victory.  Then I remembered that Russell Hantz plays his idol in that same episode, meaning the flip most likely doesn’t matter, and apart from a slight boot order change, the season as a whole remains untouched.  Uninteresting, and therefore not worth talking about.  

In addition to these hard-and-fast guidelines, there are also what I call “Flexible Guidelines”.  As the name would imply, these can be bent with a compelling arguments, but they are things that should be borne in mind when suggesting new situations to examine:

4. US Seasons Only: This is nothing against international seasons of “Survivor”.  From what I’ve heard through the grapevine, they can be quite good.  The trouble is, as a citizen on the US, the US version of “Survivor” is the one I’m most familiar with, know the most about, and have seen the most of.  I haven’t even seen a full international season of “Survivor”, just the occasional clip.  Nothing knocking them, of course.  I just haven’t gotten around to viewing them.  So, while I won’t outright ban the suggesting of changes from non-US seasons of “Survivor”, bear in mind that I’m unlikely to pick them due to a lack of knowledge and lack of time to catch up on the seasons.  

5. I Will Not Do Brandon Flipping At The Africa Final 9: A flip by Brandon Quinton at the Final 9 of “Survivor Africa”, voting out Lex instead of Kelly, would indeed fit all the criteria mentioned above.  I’m refusing this particular scenario, not because it isn’t interesting or worth talking about, but because it was already covered by Mario Lanza in his book “When it Was Worth Playing For”.  He covered it so well and so thoroughly that I don’t think I would have anything to add.  I’m willing to consider this scenario if someone can give me a compelling reason that Mario is wrong, or there’s some aspect he didn’t consider, but until that time, this scenario is out.  Other “Survivor Africa” scenarios are ok, though.

6. Try Not To Repeat Seasons: This is by far the most flexible of the flexible guidelines, particularly as many seasons have multiple inflection points with a fascinating change to dissect.  However, to prevent a lot of repetition, I try and prioritize scenarios from a season I haven’t done a “What-If?” on yet, over ones that I’ve already covered one scenario on.  You can feel free to submit scenarios for seasons I’ve already looked at, but bear in mind that I’m unlikely to cover them until I’m out of ideas for “What-Ifs?” on seasons I haven’t done yet.  For reference, at the time of this writing, I have done scenarios from the following seasons: Africa, Marquesas, Pearl Islands, All-Stars, Palau, Guatemala, Exile Island, Micronesia, Gabon, Samoa, Heroes vs. Villains, Redemption Island, One World, Philippines, Blood vs. Water, Cambodia, Kaoh Rong, Game Changers, Ghost Island, Island of the Idols, Winners at War.

As always, thank you so much for following my mad ramblings, and I look forward to hearing what you want to read next in the comments!

-Matt

Idol Speculation: “Survivor 43” Episode 5: Fatherly Love

The “Mom” archetype.  One of the most talked about in “Survivor” canon.  Yet its gender-flipped counterpart, the “Dad” archetype, very rarely gets play.  Oh sure, we’ve had some “Dads” on “Survivor”.  While not technically that archetype, I’d say Bob Crowley of “Survivor Gabon” gave off big “Dad” energy.  The moment in which I most like Tyson was him playing with his daughter on “Winners at War”.  And Jeremy Collins made his kids a central part of his strategy on “Survivor Cambodia”.  But apart from Jeremy, and Rocksroy on “Survivor 42”, no one has really made the “Dad” archetype the center of their strategy.  Tonight we perhaps see why, as our most prominent Dads of the season either screw up their own games because of their kids, or betray their kids, leading to their games getting screwed up.  

Getting back from Tribal, one would expect there to be drama, and there is.  Surprisingly, though, it is not from Geo seeming to be left out of the vote.  Indeed, Geo informs us that he was fully aware Lindsay was going, but threw a vote on Cassidy since he was the person Lindsay was voting for him.  It’s not explicitly said, but presumably Geo is worried about a Shot in the Dark coming back on him.  Of course, the obvious counter-argument is that if Lindsay played her Shot in the Dark, she wouldn’t have a vote, but on the other hand, Geo could be worried about his name on a re-vote.  Point being, I don’t fault his logic.  

That said, his logic is based on the faulty premise that he is in with the majority, with Cassidy on the outs.  Despite Cassidy voting with you last episode.  Cassidy and Karla take time to mock Geo privately for this delusion, but I’m sure that won’t mean anything for the episode down the road.  

Over at Dumbass Tribe, Jeanine and Elie are up to their old tricks again.  They’ve searched what they believe to be every significant nook and cranny on the island.  Except, you know, the giant, significant tree.  After giving a description of how the tree should be edited, which the editors comply with a la Russell Swan on “Survivor Philippines” (arguably another contender for the central “Dad” archetype in their game), Jeanine gets to searching.  In fairness to all the people on the Dumbass Tribe, I would say their Beware Advantage is the most well-hidden.  Vesi had it easiest, with the advantage just lying out on a low branch, not even attempting to blend in.  Coco’s was also technically in the open, but on a higher branch, and closer to the color of the tree in question.  Dumbass’ was stuck down in a nook between two branches, and blended quite well.  And, to add insult to injury, was covered in ants, which Jeanine had to bat off before running to Elie to open the advantage.  

Jeanine barely hesitates in opening the advantage, given what she believes the tribe to be.  Gabler is perceived as such an annoyance that Jeanine does not believe her vote will be necessary to oust him.  Of course there is the little matter of his idol, but she and Elie are still drinking the “Gabler doesn’t think it works.” Kool-Aid.  Finding out about the bead issue (and we actually get a close up of most of the beads this time, and they are the most cool-looking of the bag beads, save for Owen’s which is kind of “blah”), Jeanine and Elie decide they don’t want Owen to know what’s up.  True, he’s nominally on their side, but there’s something about him they just don’t trust.  

Cue Owen immediately walking up on the pair.  The Irony Gods must be rolling on the floor.  

No, Jeanine and Elie are in luck.  Owen did not actually HEAR them say they don’t trust him, though they are forced to reveal the existence of Jeanine’s Beware Advantage, and how it works.  Owen DOES contemplate simply refusing to give up his bead, but given that he’s playing both sides, he gives it up in the end.  To his benefit, I would say.  Making a stink about the bead think would tip one’s hand too much if you know why, and thus probably more trouble than it’s worth.  An idol is powerful, true, but only if used right, and there’s no guarantee Jeanine will be able to do that.  

Elie informs Sami of the situation.  He has to give up his bead in order to maintain his bluff against the women, but is clearly happy that Jeanine may be without a vote.  This seems all the more likely when Gabler, the one person who hasn’t been told about the rules for the Beware Advantage, buys Jeanine’s bracelet cover story, but is reluctant to part with that specific bead, saying he is saving it for his daughter.  Ouch.  Right in the family feels.  How’s Jeanine going to overcome this one?  

Pretty easily, apparently.  With the mere offer of trading back the beads Gabler had previously bequeathed her, Gabler gives up the bead she most wants.  If I’m Gabler’s daughter, I’m pissed right now.  Me personally?  I’m more pissed at the editors.  There must have been some great social manipulation on the part of Jeanine if Gabler really had his heart set on that particular bead, unless the edit played it up.  Thus, either the edit hyperbolized things to a degree even I can’t take, or we missed out on seeing some great gameplay from Jeanine.  Whichever is the truth, I’m pissed.  

When I first saw Gabler refuse and give the daughter excuse, I thought perhaps Sami had got to Gabler beforehand, warned him of the danger, and told him not to give up his bead under any circumstances.  Then Gabler gave it away, and that theory went out the window.  This is confirmed when Sami fills Gabler in on what just happened.  To his credit, Gabler is a fantastic sport about the whole thing, congratulating Jeanine in confessional, even though he admits this makes the game harder for him.  

Off to our challenge, which if the lack of Caps Lock was any indicator, is nothing to write home about.  Pretty standard obstacle course with little we haven’t seen before.  I’ll give credit that it’s bringing back some elements that have been long-absent, though.  Particularly the “Carry a bucket of water to dump in another bucket over a tricky balance course” element.  That’s been around pretty much since the show began, but it’s been gone for a while, so I’m cool with it coming back here.  

I’ll also give credit that this obstacle course actually made me like the “Ski-Ball” ending.  Yes, really.  I’ve hated it since its inception on “Survivor Blood vs. Water”, but this one I don’t hate.  Why?  Simple: They took away the notches at the end.  Apart from just making this look less like a carnival game, this also means the shots take more skill, since you need to finesse your throws just so to make sure they don’t go too far and roll off the back.  This also means there’s the devastating potential to undo your progress by knocking the balls off the platform in the throwing process.  Not that this could happen to anyone, could it?  

Sure enough, it does.  As our tribes race for immunity and tarps of varying sizes, depending on first or second place finishing (lest you think a challenge a quarter of the way through the episode meant a double Tribal), things stay fairly even.  Dumbass is slightly behind, understandable given they’ve had the most strategy talk this episode, but no one’s out of it, and everyone ends up on the (difficult) ball-throwing portion.  Vesi unsurprisingly does the best.  I say “unsurprising” because they got zero strategic content pre-challenge, so it was all but a given they would be immune.  Better that they get first place outright, even if I do hate that it pokes a hole in my “No addition by subtraction.” theory.  Coco seems to have a slight lead throughout, but fumbles when Ryan tries to use the two balls he’s landed as a stop, thereby upsetting all of them, and allowing Sami to have his victory.  

With no double-Tribal in the offing this episode, we see the REAL reason the challenge is so early: ADVANTAGES!  Yes, it’s time once again for Vesi to select one person from each tribe to go on a quest.  They evidently decide to go via Phoneme Alliteration, as Geo, Jeanine, and Jesse are all selected to go.  Can’t fault any of the choices from the outside, really.  

Now, you might think Ryan just made a bad judgment call in the challenge, particularly as we saw both Cassidy and Geo suggest Ryan bounce off the two balls up top, leading to the loss.  But no!  Ryan wants you to know that he INTENDED to lose that challenge!  Oh, he didn’t come in planning to throw it, but he wants Cassidy out, and so he’s ok with losing.  And I buy this line of “I meant to do that” was much as I did when Phillip Sheppard said the same thing on “Survivor Caramoan”.  That is to say, NOT AT ALL!  Hell, I’d be more inclined to believe PHILLIP in this case, since Phillip at least did so after the tribe swap, and thus might have legit reason to want someone out.  Throwing a challenge to get out CASSIDY?  Look, she’s a good strategist to watch out for, but she’s not challenge-throw worthy.  Or is this the edit telling us that Cassidy is the next Erika Casupanan (“Survivor 41”)?  Either way, not buying this.  I think Ryan just goofed.  

Even if he were inclined to blame his tribemates, Ryan would not do so.  Why?  Because he’s just that nice!  So nice is Ryan that when discussing what lie to tell Cassidy with Karla and James, Ryan volunteers himself, basically saying they should act pissed at him for losing the challenge.  Credit where credit is due: It takes a lot of guts to volunteer yourself as what you believe to be the decoy.  It can certainly be the smart move.  Note that volunteering someone else as the decoy was a contributing factor to Andrew Savage’s loss on “Survivor Cambodia”.  So, if Ryan truly believes the vote to be Cassidy, I can’t fault him too much for the overall move.  Some of the details, however, go a bit far.  In particular Ryan asking people not to strategize with him AT ALL seems an unnecessary risk, but at least it makes sense.  Worse is Ryan telling Cassidy to vote him if she has to.  Look, there’s being a good sport, and then there’s being an UNBELIEVABLY good sport!  Ryan is hamming it up a bit much here and, like Geo earlier, is roundly mocked for it.  

As to our adventurers, they’re dropped off at a platform to row a boat in rough seas to a sand spit.  Look, I know we said we wanted variety in the journeys, and this is better than nothing, but we meant more the MECHANISM for getting an advantage on the journeys, or even whether there’s any advantage at all!  Changing up the method of getting there is nice, but is the least of our concerns.  

One constant is being told to get to know one another.  Which they would probably do, if Geo didn’t dominate the conversation.  Geo hams it up that he was on the outs at the last vote, and swears he’s going to risk for whatever is there.  Basically trying to do what Noelle did when she went on the journey a few episodes ago.  Geo, however, believes himself to be lying, which raises suspicion on both Jeanine’s and Jesse’s parts.  Well, ok, Jesse says he thinks Geo is telling the truth, but this may not stop him from going for an advantage.  I think the key Geo is missing is offering some alliance down the road in return, as Noelle did.  Gives people some incentive besides pity to not risk their vote.  

The only person I could fault for risking here is Jeanine.  After all that paranoia about losing your vote, and ALREADY having an idol, you’re going to risk again?  Jesse, however, believes he’s good with his group, and so has little reason not to risk for himself, and Geo believes the same.  In reality, Geo is on the outs, but as there are no numbers for him to get back in power, he needs some sort of leverage, so I can’t fault his decision here.  I will fault Jesse’s logic of “what would my kids want?”, but admittedly this is results-oriented talk.  

Sure enough, all agree to risk, and head back to their camps.  The one true flaw in this episode is that unlike the last time we had multiple people risk, we see each tribe do theirs one at a time, meaning the third tribe shown contains the individual whose risk paid off.  We start on Vesi.  One flaw of keeping the mechanism the same on each journey is it means that a lie can be easily seen through, making a lie harder.  Jesse is completely honest with his tribe, opens it in front of them, and finds out that he predictably lost his vote.  Jeanine on Dumbass is next, though she sneaks past her sleeping tribe to open it in private… Before coming back and pretending to open it in front of them, revealing her lost vote in the process.  What was the point of sneaking away then?  Sami calls this a bad move for Jeanine in confessional, and we move on.  

As expected, Geo got the advantage, another “Knowledge is Power”.  This lends credence to the idea that the specific advantage is based on how many people risk for it, since this is inarguably the most powerful of the three (some would say broken, but I disagree), but of course we don’t have definitive proof.  Geo is the only one who initially lies to his group, but after he and Karla go for a walk, he comes clean to her.  Ok, show, is Geo’s number one Karla or Ryan?  You’ve gone back and forth on this a number of times, and we kind of need a definitive answer!  It’s important for us to understand the strategy dynamics!  

Unfortunately for Geo, Karla is not truly on his side, no matter what he thinks.  She spills the beans to Cassidy and James.  We don’t actually see her SAY what Geo got, but we can presume she did.  Still, Cassidy is not please.  She, after all, is the TRUE decoy vote of the night, and wants to switch the vote to Ryan just to be safe.  While I would point out that Geo can’t actually DO anything to save himself with that advantage, unless he steals Karla’s idol that no one but her knows about, it’s hard to blame Cassidy for being paranoid as the decoy.  Blame they do, however, as Karla and James talk about Cassidy going “Full Lindsay” in insisting on getting her way and being paranoid.  As such, they talk about bringing the vote back on to her.  

Put bluntly, this would be a dumb move.  Random moments aside, Geo and Ryan seem to be a tight two, and if you want to maintain your power on this tribe, they need to be broken up tonight.  As to which of the two should go, it’s more of a toss-up.  Ryan is better in challenges, and should you all make the merge, is a more visible threat, and thus a better shield.  Geo, meanwhile, seems to have more of a relationship with the majority, and does have an advantage that could be used to the tribe’s benefit.  On the whole, though, I say voting out Geo is the smarter move of the two.  You don’t know when the merge is coming, so keeping Ryan around works out just in case the merge is far away.  And even if it’s close, hey, he’s a shield!  The big factor for me, though, is how Geo will use his advantage.  As Karla points out, this is a powerful advantage, and one that could be used against her to blow up her game.  Now, it could be argued that she has some influence over Geo, and has hidden her idol well.  I would counter that, unless Cassidy goes tonight, Geo will realize he’s not in the majority, and will thus be less inclined to what others have to say about where and when his advantage is used.  After tonight, I don’t see Geo using his advantage for anyone but Geo.  As well he shouldn’t, of course, but it means there’s basically no reason to keep him around anymore.  

There are two main topics at our much more somber Tribal tonight, with momentum being the first.  Cassidy irritates the statistician in me by saying she believes in momentum.  Look, if you know anything about statistics, “Streaks” are a myth.  A statistical probability that people read far too much into, and believe in some mystical force that isn’t there.  The only thing that MAY have an effect is a belief that you are or aren’t in a streak affecting your performance, which is all psychology, all in your head.  Just keep a positive mindset and it won’t fall out that way, apart from random chance.  

This is basically the attitude that Ryan adopts, and is basically the topic for the rest of Tribal.  Ryan is a nice guy.  Just so nice.  Trying to play as fair as possible, and at peace with wherever he goes out.  Everyone just talks about how nice Ryan is; how much they can’t believe it.  Some even speculate that they don’t believe it.  It speaks to Ryan’s charm that I actually kind of believe the guy.  Anyone going from Coco would be a loss at this point, as I like them all, but Ryan would be a particularly hard one.  We may not have much of his backstory since the first episode, but the dude is just so inherently likeable.  

For once, the tribe plays optimally, and Geo goes home in a blindside.  In keeping with the other theme this episode, dude is a good sport about it in his final exit interview.  Despite it being the smart move, I am sorry to see Geo go.  It may have been earned strategically, but the dude seemed like a nice guy, and was certainly putting all his effort in the game, which is always nice to see.  He may have earned his exit, but he will be missed.  On the plus side, we finally have a man voted off this season after four straight women.  Something different!  Yay!

Remember all that speculation that the merge was a while away?  Yeah, no, it’s next episode.  With 13 people still left.  Look, I know the double-elimination first episode (whether by immunity or medevac) was getting predictable, but I meant change up WHEN said double-elimination happens, not remove it entirely!  13 people left is just too many.  Then again, I think 11 people left is too many, so what do I know?

Dumbass tribe having a plurality at the merge?  Did not see that coming.  Will be interesting to see how that plays out next week.  

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.  

Idol Speculation: “Survivor 41” Finale: Predictably Predictable

Say what you will about this season of “Survivor”.  For all its ups and downs, for all the experiments it never took its eye off the fact that it needed to tell a story.  Particularly in the latter half of the season, the story took precedence, rather than the experimentation, and for that I am grateful.  If nothing else, it made the finale a fun watch.  Bear in mind, though, that a good story is not necessarily an unpredictable story, as this finale, for all of its strong points, may be one of the most predictable ones in recent memory.  

But before I can tell you THAT story, I have to tell you THIS story!  Yes, it wouldn’t be a finale blog without one final edition of…

MATT’S MESS-UP!

Pretty brief one this time, but a mess-up nonetheless.  You see, last episode I neglected to mention Deshawn living out one of my dreams, which is to snark back at a Probst catchphrase.  Specifically, when Probst offers the “Candy or Chicken” reward, he asks, as per usual, “Worth playing for?”  Deshawn says “No”, and says he wants family letters instead.  I know he got made fun of for this, but I’d say it was pretty understandable and sympathetic.  Granted, I’ve always wanted to snark more at “Wanna know what you’re playing for?” and “Once again, immunity, back up for grabs”, but that’s just me.  

We start off the true finale with Probst once again talking directly to the audience, though for once, I’m actually ok with it.  It feels like a substitute for the old “season recap with Probst narration”, and therefore more appropriate.  We also replace the “Reason why everyone will win” bit with the contestants building themselves up, which is more natural and does a better job of hiding the true contenders than the former option.  Even the clips of the season being projected on flotsam I can get behind, as it’s just the kind of hokiness I expect from “Survivor”.  I do get a little nervous when Probst talks about “One new twist”, but it turns out he’s just referring to reading the votes and doing a “season recap” on the island instead of live.  Unfortunately, but a necessity due to COVID restrictions, so it’s all good.  

That said, I do have to question the wisdom of removing the recap ENTIRELY.  True, it takes up a lot of time, but for people just tuning in for the finale… Oh, who am I kidding.  No one does that anymore.  No one channel surfs anymore.  Streaming media has not only taken away my best argument for why “Survivor” should leave Fiji once in a while, but now it’s also taken away the need for recaps at the top of episodes.  

Getting back from Tribal, Deshawn is of course in hot water over his “truth bomb”.  In an effort to show what he’s learned, he DOES act humble about the whole thing and admit it wasn’t very good, but the damage is done.  Though the pair make nice the next morning, neither trusts the other.  Contrast with the relationship between Erika and Ricard, which has only strengthened, and Ricard is going to make sure it stays that way.  Recognizing that he’s the biggest threat, Ricard wants to keep someone else on everyone’s mind, and with Deshawn blowing up his game last episode, he is that someone.  Ricard does this, but awkwardly using Deshawn’s proper name as often as possible.  Look, the PRINCIPLE for Ricard is sound, but man is it awkward to see him put it into practice.  

Sadly, my hope for no more advantages, especially in the finale, is dashed, as one final note is given to the contestants.  They must unscramble letters into words, then those words into a sentence, before going off to find said advantage, with the first one to do so getting it.  It’s a decent puzzle, and nice that they put it on screen for everyone at home to play along… IS WHAT I WOULD BE SAYING IF THEY LEFT IT UP THERE FOR MORE THAN 5 SECONDS AT A TIME/  REALLY, WHAT WAS THE POINT?  I will credit it, though, that it did tie into the “Game within the game” aspect.  If you didn’t play along on the website, basically every puzzle you solved, in addition to a question about the next episode, gave you a few letters, which would unscramble to a phrase.  The phrase in this episode, in fact, which is a nice touch.  

Once decoded, the phrase says the advantage is in “dancing trees”.  Erika is the last to solve the phrase, but it matters not, as she finds her advantage in a tree that frankly looks like several other trees out there.  Distinctive in its own way, I guess, but there were trees in the background that looked more like they were “dancing” to me.  Erika’s advantage for once comes with no downside, and is just a challenge advantage at the next immunity challenge.  As it’s not the final challenge, I’m ok with this.  Good for Erika!  

Speaking of said challenge, there’s sadly not much to speak about.  Your usual obstacle course with two puzzle ladders, and a 70+ piece logo puzzle at the end.  Bog standard fare, but it does come with the Joe Del Campo (“Survivor Kaoh Rong”) Memorial Reward of kebabs for two.  Erika’s advantage also turns out to be a bit OP, since half of her ladders are solved already.  This gives her a major lead into the puzzle, one she’s able to keep throughout the challenge.  Yeah, there’s no competition.  In a rare editing misstep, Probst tells us Ricard is close behind, but when we see Ricard, Erika’s puzzle (next to his) is clearly more complete than we just saw at a second ago.  Manipulative editing, folks.  

So Erika’s immune, breaking this season’s streak of those in danger winning immunity.  This spells doom for Ricard, though oddly he doesn’t seem to think so.  When Erika talks to him about how tough the decision is, Ricard starts off saying how it looks like it should be a no-brainer, which sounds like he’s going to show good self-knowledge about his threat level… And then he talks about how Erika hates Deshawn and should vote him out.  Way to go, Ricard.  

Erika does talk about the conflict of her heart, which wants to vote out Deshawn, and her head, which says Ricard must go.  Erika sadly can’t sell it like Shan can, and this is a no-brainer.  Ricard NEEDS to go.  He is, far and away, the biggest jury threat left.  You CANNOT, under any circumstances, keep him in the game, and the show itself is only making a half-hearted attempt to say he might stay.  We need something else to make Tribal more exciting.  

Enter Xander.  For all those saying I was too hard on Xander, and not giving him credit where his credit was due… Well, you’re probably right overall, but this episode does its best to vindicate me in my feelings.  Xander tanks HARD this episode, and while he actually DOES avoid doing a dumb here, he teeters dangerously close.  This being the last night his idol can be played, Xander wants to play his idol, and wants it to matter.  Sadly, he does not have the brains of goddess Angelina of “Survivor David vs. Goliath”, and rather than come up with a convoluted way for him to play his idol correctly, he just wants to play it on Ricard.  Which yes, would be playing an idol correctly, but this is somewhat offset by the fact that YOU KEPT THE BIGGEST JURY THREAT AROUND!  A CORRECT IDOL PLAY DOESN’T MATTER IF THE OUTCOME HURTS YOU IN THE LONG RUN!

But really, this is a feeble attempt at misdirection.  Even I, on my most anti-Xander day, would not accuse him of being that dumb.  Tribal Council doesn’t even try to hide it, with the whole thing just being a Ricard love-fest.  Ricard goes over his life status, and it pulls at the heartstrings, not going to lie.  Ricard even goes full Jeremy Collins on “Survivor Cambodia” in an attempt to stay, talking about how he and his husband are having a second child soon.  Everyone is emotional, but are ultimately ruled by their heads.  

Yes, if the emotional buildup didn’t clue you in, Ricard is gone.  Xander does play his idol, but wisely pays it for himself, just to be safe.  I am, of course, sorry to see Ricard go, as he was one of my favorites the entire season, but for there to be any tension at Final Tribal, he needed to go.  At least he’s a good sport of the way out.  

Back at camp, Xander continues his hot streak of bad ideas, talking about how a little drizzle doesn’t matter to them, even without a shelter on their new beach.  Xander evidently never watched cartoons, as a downpour now commences, and everyone runs for the cover of trees.  Trust me, compared to what we’re going to see later on, this is hardly Xander’s worst mistake.  

First, though, we have to get a GOOD bit of Xander content up in here.  Yes, out of everyone left, Xander is the only one not to yet get some sort of inspirational moment/flashback, and this must be corrected.  Him talking about proving to himself what he could do, coupled with photos of young Xander becoming more athletic, is nice, but it’s too little, too late.  I was willing to spot Danny his moment a few episodes ago, but your in the finale  Too late to do your work now.  

Plus, it kills any chance of anyone but Xander winning final immunity, and deciding who goes to Final Four firemaking, which is regrettably still around.  Also regrettable, our immunity challenge, where players have to spell “Final 3” in blocks while walking on effectively a large bow, and needing to keep everything balanced.  Not because the challenge is bad in and of itself, but because it comes from “Survivor Edge of Extinction”.  If you’re somehow new to the blog, suffice to say that in my opinion, every aspect of that season, save for Rick Devans and Big Wendy, should be expunged from the history of the show.  

Sure enough, Xander wins, and though he makes an effort to talk to everyone left regarding his decision, he doesn’t make a big secret about what he wants to do.  Deciding that he can’t give Erika the “victory” of winning the firemaking challenge (another point against “Survivor Edge of Extinction”: That becoming the meta), Xander is going to send Heather and Deshawn against each other, foreshadowed earlier by Deshawn talking about not wanting to do it.  Of the pair, Heather is set up as the better fire maker, thereby all but ensuring her defeat.  

Honestly, her best chance is Xander doing a dumb, and when Xander sees Erika having trouble starting fire (which I have to assume, given what we’ve seen of her fire-making abilities, was her trying to lower her threat level in that area), he gets just such an idea.  Because we haven’t drawn ENOUGH from “Survivor Edge of Extinction” lately, Xander contemplates giving up immunity to beat Erika in firemaking.  Going full Chris Underwood up in here.  And look, taking out a threat is a big move you can hang your hat on at the end.  Plus, it gives you publicity at arguably the most crucial time.  But the fact remains that you have to give up safety in the game to do so, and YOU SHOULD NEVER GIVE UP SAFETY IN THE GAME OF “SURVIVOR”!  The real thing to remember here, though, is that Xander is acknowledging in this scene that Erika is his biggest competition, a fact that Heather emphasizes. So it makes sense that Xander doesn’t want to give her glory, but guaranteeing her an end spot feels little better.  I can see the logic of Xander wanting to go full Underwood, but it’s flawed.  

Thankfully, even Xander wouldn’t do that.  No, he does something arguably even dumber.  You see, he sticks with his original plan to take Erika to the end with a free pass, and force Heather and Deshawn to fire making.  The flaw?  To lower Erika’s threat, he talks about how he doesn’t think her game is that threatening.  No evidence, no logic, just his opinion.  The flaw here is that the jury clearly is not buying this, and as a result, Xander appears to be either A) Out of Touch, or B) Blatantly Trying to Spin a Lie.  In either case, he’s failing miserably, and tanking his own chances as a result.  

Is there any upside to this Tribal Council?  Yes there is!  We get the awesome music from “Survivor Island of the Idols” back once again!  Hooray!

Credit where it is due, while I still despite forced fire making at Final Four, this is one of the more exciting duels.  It’s not funny, like the super-long one in “Survivor Cook Island”, nor emotional like Aubry vs. Cydney in “Survivor Kaoh Rong”, but it is an actual nail-biter of a challenge.  Heather has the early lead, but while her fire burns a bit of the rope, it doesn’t go through, giving Deshawn just enough time to win by three seconds.  Good for him!  Heather, while nice as a person is probably the least interesting person left, and the biggest finale goat, so better to have her out of the way for our finalists.  

This is all evidenced by our finalists all having good “Why I should win” summaries during the final day montage.  Xander talks about finding his advantages and using them effectively, Erika talks about building up her game from the background to the foreground, and Deshawn… Gives us the “I’ve grown so much” narrative.  Ok, Deshawn’s is a bit weaker, but he was hardly a load in this game, and has something he can at least argue.  

This point is emphasized all the more when Evvie, truly the best jury foreperson, says that everyone there has a shot at some votes, and it’s a tough choice.  And I will say, while I still prefer the old jury format, this is probably the best iteration of the new one yet.  I think it’s the fact that it’s just the jury talking, and Probst doesn’t interject into the proceedings.  It feels more pure, though again, I still prefer the questions, if only for the hilarious ones we get sometimes.  Danny TRIES to go there with his sports “Divide the game into quarters” analogy, which really doesn’t work.  

Sadly, Evvie’s pronouncement does not seem too founded, as the jury clearly favors Erika.  They RIP into Deshawn when he talks up his “social game” and direct most of their specific questions at the other two.  Xander they seem to at least give a chance to persuade them, and a few seem to be in his corner.  Tiffany and Liana seem to ask questions trying to get Xander to talk about his moves in the game, seemingly to give him a chance to prove himself to the jury.  

Here, however, Xander once again falls flat.  When asked to talk about his social game, he says “Um” about a half-dozen times before coming up with a half-baked answer that seems to satisfy pretty much no one on the jury.  Going into this, I had Xander as my number two for win potential.  Had I known that he had the Final Tribal Council skills of Amanda Kimmel (“Survivor China”), I would, of course, have had him lower.  

Unsurprisingly, Erika wins, but we get a definitive second place in Deshawn, who somehow snagged one vote despite largely being shut out of the proceedings.  Presumably Danny voted for him, but I can’t be sure.  In any case, everyone is shocked that the vote is read live, and is then followed immediately by what is effectively our reunion show.  Lights are brought up on the Tribal Council set, and the contestants are given champagne and pizza, the latter of which they must compliment, presumably on threat of losing their prize money.  I imagine the dream team just of camera, checks in one hand, lighters in the other.  

Not much to talk about at our Reunion.  The setting is cool.  They talk with most everyone.  The absence of the pre-jury is felt, though I can understand why they’re not allowed to be there.  Naseer talks about learning English from “Survivor” for the umpteenth time.  We get a lot of emotional beats from the likes of Ricard and Danny.  Plus, there’s no awkward audience participation.  Good stuff.  Loses points, though, for playing “Ancient Voices” during it, which serves only to remind us what we could have been having.  Bring back the intro, CBS!

Season 42 looks fun, though they’re clearly borrowing a lot from this season.  Understandable, but as I’ll get to later, a concern.  First, time for the old “Idol Speculation” staple: Looking back at my pre-season cast assessment and seeing just how off my predictions were!

Sydney-Wrong.  Took after Russell Hantz (“Survivor Samoa”) far more than I thought, and rightfully lasted much shorter as a result.  

Danny-Wrong.  Much more flexible and savvier than I had predicted.  

Liana-Pretty much right.  Mid-merge boot, not super memorable.  The feud with Xander was fun, though.  

Brad-Not out QUITE as early as I predicted, but still pretty much right.  

JD-Wrong.  Turns out the dude is only good if he’s got a script to work off of.  

Evvie-Wrong.  They were much better at taking control than I gave them credit for.  

Ricard-Right overall.  He was a threat to win, though somewhat less charming on screen than I expected.  

Shan-Wrong.  Much less religious, and much more game-savvy than I had anticipated.  She lasted longer than I thought, obviously.

Naseer-Right about boot time, wrong about personality.  While he DID talk about overcoming adversity as much as I thought, the dude had the charm to pull it off without getting annoying, which I did not foresee.  

Genie-Sadly right.  

Xander-Wrong.  Despite what this last episode might indicate, the dude was much more game-savvy than I gave him credit for.  

Sara-Wrong, though in fairness, I couldn’t anticipate such a dumb challenge mistake, nor that she would pay the price for it.  

Voce-Wrong.  Much more socially palatable, though oddly much shorter-lived as well.  

Deshawn-Pretty much right, though like Ricard, less charming than I would have thought.  

Tiffany-Wrong, flat out.  

Eric-Wrong.  He just wasn’t made for a faster-paced season like this.  

Heather-Wrong, though had I known tribe makeup beforehand, I would have been closer.  Being on the super-winning all the time tribe will do that.  

Erika-RIGHT!  HAHA!  CHALK UP ANOTHER CORRECT PRE-SEASON PICK FOR “IDOL SPECULATION”, Y’ALL!  

In terms of this season as a whole, the best way I can sum it up is that it succeeds in spite of itself.  For once, I don’t mean it’s a good season with a bad theme (see “Survivor David vs. Goliath”), but rather, production seemed hell-bent on trying to make this season bad, adding twist after poorly-conceived twist after poorly-implemented twist.  While I don’t have data to back this up, but if you were to chart relative enjoyment of each episode by the fanbase with the number of twists and advantages added in a given episode, I suspect you would find an inverse correlation.  To put it another way, the more random shit they crammed into an episode, the less enjoyable the episode.  

Now, I’ve made my opinions on these twist clear, and I’ve made my opinions of the number of them in the season clear.  Equally, production has made their views on these issues clear.  Thus, if production by some miracle happens to be reading this blog, I’m not going to get into a debate with you about whether or how many or what advantages should be in the game.  Clearly you’ve made up your minds, and for the foreseeable future, they’re here to stay.  So, instead, let me make a point about all these advantages and your show, one that even production will have to concede has some validity:

You.  Do.  Not.  Have.  Time.  

Leave aside whether advantages are good for the game, the fact is you simply do not have enough time for all these advantages, and still have a good game.  That inverse correlation I speculated about?  Should it exist, I would hypothesize that it is due not necessarily to the quality of the twist themselves, but to all the time they take up.  Time to introduce the twist.  Time to explain the twist.  Time for someone to find/use the twist.  Other players talking about the twist.  It just eats up precious screen time the show does not have.  As Probst himself used to say, “Ultimately, it is a SOCIAL game”  The show lives and dies on the audience connecting with the cast, and for that, they need time to get to KNOW the cast.  Time you are taking away with all these idols and advantages.  

Now, to be fair, there are two solutions to this.  Reduce the number of advantages in the game, particularly new ones that require in-depth explanation, or have longer episodes.  I would be fine with either option, but let’s be real: While “Survivor” is a consistent show from a ratings perspective, and has gone up due to renewed exposure via online streaming/quarantine, the fact is it is not the ratings juggernaut the early seasons were, and it would need those kind of numbers to justify going to 90 minutes or 2 hours as the standard episode.  I’d enjoy that, but it’s just not realistic.  Realistically, the only solution is to reduce the number of advantages in the game, and while 42 is out the window already, I can hold out hope for 43 and beyond.  Also, NEVER do the “Do or Die” again.  I’ll spot you 42, but after that?  NEVER AGAIN!

So, if time is such a big problem, why does this season still succeed?  Because they had a stellar cast, who managed to shine in SPITE of their reduced time in which to do so  This was overall a very even edit (save for some outliers like Heather being invisible most of the game, and Erika, while she had an obvious winner edit in the second half, being invisible pre-merge), where everyone got at least a bit of content, and we felt like we got to know most of the people on this season.  Credit where it’s due, production did there part as well, as this connection was aided by the “flashbacks” to real life, which I still thoroughly enjoyed.  Still, this cast succeeded DESPITE the obstacles in their path, not because of them.  Consider what would have happened if this cast had been replaced with the cast from a season that’s not great, but not terrible.  You know, just kind of “average”.  Say, for instance, the cast of “Survivor San Juan del Sur” or “Survivor Heroes vs. Healers vs. Hustlers” had played on this season.  Wouldn’t have stood out nearly as much.  And this is the disaster you court, “Survivor”.  Unless you can have a home-run cast every season, you had best consider cutting back the number of advantages.  

In terms of overall ranking, this season definitely falls in the “good” category.  The twists drag it down, but the cast and some editing choices elevate it.  I would probably put it smack-dab in the middle of my rankings, just below “Survivor The Australian Outback”.  A solid, enjoyable season, but not quite good enough to be one of the all-time greats.  That ranking is nothing to sneeze at, though, and it’s been great getting back into “Survivor” with you all!  As usual we’ll be on hiatus until next season’s cast is announced, so I look forward to hearing from you all then! 

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.  

“Survivor” Retrospectives: Cambodia

Well, that break went on far longer than intended. But no matter! With no new season on the horizon, I’d say it’s a fine time to resurrect an old series. A look back at the past, if you will. Yes, it’s time once again for the return on “‘Survivor’ Retrospectives”!

Given that it’s been so long, I’d say a refresher on the concept is in order. In this series, I go back through all the major elements of a season (the casts, the challenges, the twists, etc.), both recapping them objectively, as well as giving my subjective opinion on each. Each category is then given a score out of 10 for how well it holds up on its own. The exception is the “Overall” category, in which the marks from the previous categories are combined with the mark from the “Overall” category (which considers both the themes and aesthetics of the season, as well as how all the elements of the season came together), leading to a score out of 40. Naturally, this means there will be SPOILERS for the season. I will be writing as though everyone reading knows the outcome of the season, as well as the major players and events of the season. Thus, if you have not watched the season in question, as indicated by the title, read on beyond this paragraph only if you are prepared for said spoilers. However, if you wish to know my general, spoiler-free opinion on the season, scroll down to the bottom of the page. There, I have a section labeled “Abstract”, which will give you just that.

With those warnings out of the way, let us considered the case of Cambodia. The season that really felt like it began the 30’s, for good and for ill. Does it become the standard-bearer for the sins of later seasons, or does it have merit on its own? Read on and find out!

CAST

As the subtitle “Second Chances” would imply, Cambodia is an all-returnee season. This makes judging the cast a lot harder. Usually, when looking at a cast, I look at the big names to come out of a season. The flaw with a returnee season, unlike an all-newbie season, is that people can be big names both going into and coming out of a season, yet not have done much on the season as a whole. Consider the case of Rupert on “Survivor All-Stars”. The guy was a big name coming into the season, and still a big name coming out of the season, but did he really do anything during “Survivor All-Stars” to earn it? Not so much. Really, all he did was avoid tarnishing his legacy. As such, in this section, I’m only going to be discussing members of the cast who actively maintained or improved their overall perception amongst the fandom.

With that in mind, no one had a higher rise this season that Kelley Wentworth. Originally of “Survivor San Juan del Sur”, Kelley was that one person who gets on a returnee season that you think “Huh?” For reasons I’ll get into in the twist section, Kelley didn’t have that obstacle, but as a fifth boot who was nearly invisible during her first run on the show, she had arguably the lowest floor in terms of perception. Even so, Kelley can be said to have dominated the fandom in this season. She showed herself to be a sound strategic player, and a scrappy fighter, as she was rarely in the majority on the season. She also gave off a number of good sound-bytes, making her one of the rare people named “Kelly” who is not, as I once said, “as bland as beige wallpaper”. Perhaps it’s the odd spelling that does it? In any case, I can’t go into too much detail about why Kelley is so beloved without delving into the twists of the season, though her snark in confessionals definitely helped. For now, suffice to say that Kelley proved why she was considered a threat her first time around, and became a beloved fan darling for all the right reasons.

If you’re looking for someone who was popular before coming on the season, but increased it during the season, look no further than Joe “Joey Amazing” Anglim. Hailing from “Survivor Worlds Apart”, the season immediately before Cambodia, Joe was seen as something of the nice, good-looking challenge threat with not much else to note about him. Basically a newer version of Ozzy from “Survivor Cook Islands”. Cambodia did little to change that, but it did take the comparisons to a whole new level. Joe was pretty good in challenges? Now he’s immune for a month before you even have the chance to vote him off. Joe seemed comfortable in the outdoors? Now he’s so handy that he’s being referred to as “MacGyver”. He had a determination and competitive drive? Now he’s collapsing out of exhaustion during a challenge. You get the idea. This is a tried-and-true character archetype that people eat up, and Joe was no exception. I can definitely see why, and I’d argue he did more to earn it this season than on “Survivor Worlds Apart”, with just how over the top it was. That said, I do think the love for Joe is a bit overdone. There’s nothing wrong with him, of course. He’s a perfectly inoffensive guy, and quite likable, even on screen. When I first started watching the show, Joe is the sort of guy I would have gravitated toward, rooted for, and been heartbroken by his inevitable defeat. But as I’ve grown as a fan, I’ve fallen out of love with this sort of character. Again, not that there’s anything wrong with them, but they just don’t have a lot of depth to them. They’re good at survival, and that’s about it. Perhaps, then, the bet way to describe Joe is that he’s one-dimensional, but a likable one-dimensional.

Now, if Kelley and Joe are the two biggest characters to come out of the season, surely they’re the ones the season focussed on story-wise, right? Wrong! That honor would go to Spencer Bledsoe of “Survivor Cagayan”. Coming into the game, Spencer was the person I expected to do well above all others. He was perceived as an underdog, but a likable one, with a good strategic mind to boot. Add onto that him being “robbed” due to playing with Kass (who’s also on this season, but sadly doesn’t make much impact despite a valiant attempt to change up her game), and he seemed to be in the same position Cochran was in on “Survivor Caramoan”: perfectly set up to go far. And go far he did, making the final three, though not winning due to one mistake at the finish line, wherein he got a mite aggressive when campaigning against Kelley to try and avoid being voted off at the final four. This turned off what few jurors might have voted for him, leading to a perfect victory for our eventual winner, Jeremy. We’ll get to him in the next paragraph. Getting back to Spencer, though, Spencer was set up early on with the arc of needing to be more “emotional”. Understandable, considering he was a primary target of the “gamebot” criticism, but I don’t think the show pulled it off as well as they wanted to. We’re TOLD that Spencer has grown in various ways, such as professing his love for his girlfriend, or opening up with his tribemates, but since a lot of that deals with matters outside the game, it comes across as the producers shoehorning in an arc to try and get the audience to like someone. That said, I do think Spencer has an arc, and a good one at that. It’s just not the one the show pushed. Spencer may not have grown as much emotionally (at least on screen), but his arc in terms of strategy is an interesting contrast to his arc in “Survivor Cagayan”. On his first season, Spencer was plagued with perpetual bad luck. Every plan he put together pretty much fell through, and he never really found his footing. Doing well despite this made everyone praise his potential. While Spencer’s second go-around did continue his bad luck trend early on, particularly with his tribe swaps, Spencer seemed to have a better footing on where he was in the game, and more in control of his destiny. Further, come the merge, Spencer seemed to be the man of the hour. His name was rarely brought up, and he was almost always the swing vote in determining who went home. A picture-perfect strategic game, right? Possibly, but in spite of that, Spencer still lost in the end, with little to no “bad luck” to blame this time around. We may not have seen Spencer’s emotional growth on screen, but we did see him come to terms with the fact that playing well and having good luck can still result in a loss. A fascinating arc. Shame the show didn’t do more with it.

But now, onto Jeremy, the winner of the season. Similar to Spencer, Jeremy is not as big of a character, but big on the strategy Jeremy this season would pioneer what he called his “meat shield” strategy, which meant keeping around people who were perceived as bigger threats than him, to avoid getting booted post-merge. This is why Joe stuck around past his first immunity loss. Jeremy had a bit of charm that had shown through during confessionals, but the bulk of his screentime this season was devoted to strategy. And again, to his credit, that strategy worked. Jeremy was the first man to win an all-returnee season, and arguably played a perfect game (he did receive votes against him at the final six, but they were negated with an idol. Whether or not this disqualifies his “perfect game” status is up for debate, and I’m not sure there’s a wrong answer). It even got rehashed on the later “Winners at War”, though we’re nowhere near there yet. For my part, Jeremy is a fine addition to the season. Extra strategizing is always welcome, though I did tire of hearing of it after a while. Still, Jeremy played well and is a likable enough winner to be welcome on the season. Also worth mentioning here is Jeremy’s right-hand man for much of the season. Stephen Fishbach, originally of “Survivor Tocantins”, was brought back after a six-year hiatus. That said, it’s interesting to look back on Stephen’s first appearance to his second, as they make an odd contrast. On his first season, Stephen was paranoid about being cast as the “wimpy guy” who couldn’t make it in the outdoors, yet was portrayed as competent in all areas of the game, and a strategic force on the season. While his second appearance did keep some of that strategic competence, it was too focussed on the aforementioned Joe, who became a proverbial white whale for Stephen. As such, Stephen came across as paranoid and obsessed, somewhat dampening his strategic prowess, and not helped by his getting what I call “the goober edit”. Had his tribe gone to Tribal Council first, he likely goes home, due to everyone being suspicious of him, and his not being that helpful around camp. Note the scene, with goofy music, of him trying to break a tree branch, and losing. On top of that, Stephen’s general failure at challenges, coupled with the coining of “#severegastrointestinaldistress”, and it’s clear that Stephen was not meant to be taken seriously. Even so, he managed to have his moments of brilliance, and a lot of emotional insight that dwarfed what we were told Spencer had. Not the same Stephen we got the first time around, but still a fun character and occasionally good strategist.

Every major alliance needs a rival, and the head against Jeremy would be Ciera Eastin of “Survivor Blood vs. Water”. While Ciera is usually referred to as “The Woman who Voted out her Mom”, this to me is really where Ciera came into her own. She showed some good strategic chops, but now had the chance to flex them. She led the counter-alliance, referred to as the “Witch’s Coven” by Jeremy’s alliance, and actually hung on for a few votes through a combination of cunning and hidden immunity idols. Her defeat was inevitable, just due to her numbers disadvantage, but she did her best to shake up the game, making the post-merge all the more exciting. That said, she did coin the phrase “Big Moves”, which would come back to bite the show down the line, but we won’t hold that against her. That’s the show’s fault, not her’s. For what she was, Ciera was a good spoiler: Not going to win, but keeps the game from becoming so smooth that it’s boring.

Now we move on to the characters who were big at the time, but are now kind of lost to history. Really, though, there’s only one name in Cambodia that qualifies, and that name is Jeff Varner. Being from the earliest days of the show (though Kelly Wiglesworth of “Survivor Borneo” was also cast), Varner was built up big time. He had a big game personality, lots of preparation, one of the more aggressive campaigns to get on the show, and a vendetta against peanut butter to help make him memorable. Once on the show, he controlled the earliest votes, only to mess up a twist that shouldn’t really have screwed him, but ended up doing so anyway. He made a mess of his standing in a swapped tribe (the exact circumstances will be gone over in the “Twist” section), and had an early exit as a result. Varner certainly made the pre-merge exciting, and put him back on the radar for modern season. So, why was someone so influential to the early game forgotten? “Survivor Game Changers”. Yeah, wait a few seasons, but Varner will basically be writing himself out of “Survivor” history. For the moment, though, he’s a short but enjoyable part of the season, keeping up the unpredictability that will make this season so good overall.

That covers everyone that gets remembered today, but I feel like it does a disservice to the cast. Yes, there were few standouts, but most everybody brought something to the table. Usually it’s what we expected, and thus their legacy was maintained. Abi-Maria Gomes (“Survivor Philippines”) created conflict despite swearing not to do so. Keith Nale (“Survivor San Juan del Sur”) brought back the humor, and I would argue did it better, now that it wasn’t the only entertainment game in town. Andrew Savage (“Survivor Pearl Islands”) finally proved that no, he’s not good at “Survivor”, but can at least make the jury. Really, even if they weren’t the most memorable, everyone brought something to the cast. Or, I should say, almost everyone. Who in their right mind thought that Monica Padilla (“Survivor Samoa”) would be a good addition to the cast? She brought NOTHING! She appeared in the background a bit, was a focus in her boot episode, then NOTHING! Just a waste of a space that could have been filled with the more interesting T-Bird (“Survivor Africa”). The only argument I ever heard for bringing her back, apart from her looks, was that “She put the fear of God into Russell Hantz on her first season, ruining his game.” To be fair, she did do that. What I don’t agree with is that this makes her some sort of strategic mastermind. Bear in mind, RUPERT of all people also managed to put the fear of God into Russell Hantz on “Survivor Heroes vs. Villains”. Heck, Rupert did it BETTER, as his interaction with Russell actually saved him for a couple of votes. Monica? Voted out the same day. Why was she impressive again?

My score for this section may seem a bit weird, and that’s because this case is inexorably tied with a twist of the season. I’ll get to it shortly, but for now, be satisfied with the idea that the show did something with this cast that gave us, the fans, more buy-in than with previous casts, even if the majority just maintained their respective legacies this season.

Score: 9 out of 10

CHALLENGES

Every challenge in Cambodia is a repeat of an old challenge. Every. Single. One. But, since this is a returnee season, that’s to be expected. They even make a big deal out of it, with Probst noting which players left had done each challenge before, and their overall performance in said challenge. Now, this got a bit old by the end, and I would argue it led to self-defeating scenarios in some challenges (people putting themselves in a position they weren’t the best at to “redeem themselves”), but overall it was a fun touch that didn’t take up too much time overall. And as for the challenges they chose to redo? For the most part, good ones; big and memorable. They didn’t show favoritism for modern “Survivor” either, as they pulled from seasons like “Survivor Borneo” and “Survivor Africa”, which we hadn’t seen in a while. Not every challenge was a hit, of course. They used “Simmotion” from “Survivor Tocantins” for the final immunity challenge, which I maintain is among the weaker final immunity challenges due to the lack of epicness. Still, apart from one or two missteps, the challenges this season were a solid addition to the overall product, and even at their worst, tend to just be a neutral component.

Score: 9 out of 10.

TWISTS

Cambodia holds the distinction of being one of few seasons whose twists actually began in the previous season. As the title “Second Chances” indicates, the season was made up of people who had only played once before, and never won. What split it apart from returnee seasons before and after, however, was that the producers did not entirely pick the contestants. After narrowing the field to 32 potential returnees (16 men and 16 women), those watching the show were allowed to go online and vote in 10 men and 10 women to get their second chance. The results were revealed live at the end of “Survivor Worlds Apart”, also known as “The Best Thing About ‘Survivor Worlds Apart’”. Aside from the requirement that you select 10 people to return no matter what had some logistical issues (a player who gets people to vote specifically for them does not receive sole benefit of convincing people to vote for them), I’d say this is still a major hit of a twist, and the reason why the cast as a whole is stronger than it looks on paper. With pretty much any returnee season, there’s always going to be controversy in the casting choices. “Why did you ever put this person on?”; that sort of thing. You’ll also have players who don’t bring as much as they during their first go-around, and thus lose a big part of their legacy and memorability as a result. The same is true for this season, but even those early boots, you were still happy they were on and much less likely to question the choices. Why? Because, if you were a fan YOU PICKED THEM! You had a say in who got on, which created a buy-in to the cast no season has had before or since. Even if someone failed to live up to expectations, you viewed them charitably because they were, in a sense, your cast. You had ownership like you never had before, thus effectively snuffing out most criticism of the casting decisions before it even had a chance to develop. This is why Kelley doesn’t come off as a weird choice for the season, particularly given her aggressive social media campaign to return. Now, there is an asterisk to this aspect of the season, but as it deals with how the season can be seen overall, I’ll be saving it for the “Overall” section. Suffice to say that by giving the fans more say on this season than on any other, the show started itself off on the right foot.

Continuing this trend, Cambodia’s first twist was a blend of old and new. After being divided into the Bayon and Ta Keo tribes, all players did the “scramble for supplies” start, a tribute to “Survivor Borneo”. However, a new hiccup came in the form of a race to a second boat, which the tribe must do together, with the reward of extra rice hanging in the balance. While not the most exciting aspect of the season, it was a good look to start the season out on: Paying homage to the past while simultaneously not just repeating everything that had been done before. Another old twist with a new spin was the hidden immunity idols. There were two new quirks to them, one good and one bad, or at least underused. Hidden immunity idols would now not look the same, just with different coloring based on tribe camps. They were new different shapes. The theory was that this made it harder to tell a fake idol from a real one. In actuality, it was pointless. While the idols no longer looked exactly the same, they still looked production-made, and very clearly not something made by one of the players. I don’t know, I was expecting them to go all-out in making the idols different. Maybe Ta Keo is your traditional idol, but then Bayon’s is a tin can with a hole in it. Harder to identify, and makes for potential hilarity when you try and convince someone it really IS an idol, and not just trash. That said, the twist itself wasn’t BAD, just kind of pointless. More impactful, however, was the hiding of idols at challenges. A clue was hidden at camp that, if found, told you where in the challenge to look for the idol. You could grab it, but had to risk being seen by your teammates. A dynamic new twist that adds drama to an already drama-filled component of the show? Sign me up! Watching someone go for one of these idols is like watching a really good spy movie, or at worst, an average spy movie. Admittedly, this twist works better during the tribal phase rather than the individual phase, but we’ll get to that in a bit.

Kelley was the first recipient of this twist, getting the Ta Keo idol at the first immunity challenge. This plus her usage helps explain why she became such a big character of this and future seasons. Not that she had much of a chance to strategize with her idol at first, since Ta Keo had to go directly from the immunity challenge to Tribal Council, with no talking. Bad flashbacks to the Michelle Yi boot on “Survivor Fiji” come up, and I must admit this was an ill-conceived twist. Thankfully it didn’t hurt anything, but it didn’t help either.

Tribal Council itself was good in terms of a twist outcome, though. Roughly speaking, Ta Keo was divided between “Old School” players and “New School” players, vying for control with Varner and Peih-Gee (“Survivor China”) in the middle. I say “roughly” because although most early players fell into “Old School”, and later players into “New School, there were exceptions. Vytas, despite being firmly from the later seasons of the show, fell into the “Old School” alliance due to his connection with Terry Deitz (“Survivor Exile Island”), who was an old school player who played with Aras, Vytas’ brother. In a blindside, Vytas himself was voted out first, and Jeff and Peih-Gee sided with the new-schoolers to vote him out. This could have made for boring tv, if it was just “New School” steamrolling “Old School”, but thankfully, this was not to be. Varner, along with everyone except Spencer and the as-yet unmentioned Shirin Oskooi from “Survivor Worlds Apart” flipped to vote out Shirin. While the second could hardly count as a “blindside”, it did show that alliances were not going to be as firm this season, helping lead to a constantly-shifting season, leading to some great moments down the road.

Episode 3 brings us our tribe swap, though not in the way expected. Instead of dividing into two new tribes, with nine members each, the show decided to create a new third tribe, Angkor, with all three tribes getting six members each. A twist that worked out well in the end, I would argue, but that badly needed the tweaks it got in later seasons. It’s good for keeping people on their toes, and helps subdivide the cast to prevent Pagongings, but MAN did the Angkor tribe get screwed in this deal. Later subdivisions like this would see the third tribe get some advantage, or at least some supplies to start them over. Angkor? Squat. Naturally, going up against two tribes that didn’t need to expend extra energy building their shelters, and already had supplies set up, Angkor was going to lose. A lot. And they did. A fun twist, but not the fairest, and in need to some tweaking.

Now, Angkor had a 4-2 majority favoring original Ta Keo, while the other two tribes had a 4-2 majority favoring the original Bayon. Had Angkor lost, and just gotten rid of the minority 2 on their tribe, there would have been boredom to be found. The weakest tribe loses constantly, and Pagongs the minority. Simple and dull. Thankfully, this did not happen, largely due to the presence of Abi-Maria on Angkor making it impossible for the original Ta Keo to stick together. Savage and Tasha were able to exploit Abi-Maria’s divisiveness, and vote out first Peih-Gee (with whom Abi-Maria had argued early in the game), then Jeff Varner (who was weak in challenges). Disappointing boots at the time, particularly as Varner was the driving force behind a lot of the early-game excitement, but again, good at keeping things shook up, and the audience on their toes. Say what you will about this season, but don’t say it had one dominant alliance steamroll over everybody the entire time.

Before we get to our next big shakeup in episode five, we should get to two minor twists that happened in between. In episode 3, Jeremy found the clue to the idol, and got it during the challenge. Fine work for him, though less exciting since we had already seen Kelley do the same thing in episode 1. Episode 4, meanwhile, featured what Probst termed a “Hero Challenge”, which had just one player from each team compete for the entire team. Not the worst idea, but it lost the epic scale that most team challenges give us, and is a stupid thing to go in for from a strategy perspective. In the end, apart from a heart warming scene of Savage handing Angkor one of the few victories (though only for reward), this twist brought little to the game, and I’m not upset about its exclusion from future seasons.

On to episode 5, and Angkor gets an honest-to-goodness challenge victory! And it’s even an immunity challenge! Thanks in large part to Stephen’s “skills” at target shooting, his tribe, Bayon, ends up going to Tribal Council. There, they continue the trend of not letting the bold majority maintain control. Monica goes home, the only original Bayon member to not make the merge. Again, while maybe not the most sound strategic decision, it is good to see that the season remains unpredictable, and solid majorities don’t stay solid for long.

Episode 6, unfortunately, starts off on a sour note. Terry gets a visit from Probst informing him that his son, Danny, has been hospitalized, and Terry needs to leave the game to be with his son. Terry understandably agrees, and gets a tearful goodbye with his fellow Ta Keo players. It doesn’t impact much in terms of the game, since Terry was likely to be voted out should Ta Keo have ever lost, but it was still a depressing and unfortunate way for a decent player to go out. Dude should have had the honor of playing his full game without outside life getting in the way, PLUS having to go through the trauma of being far from home when your child is in serious danger. Certainly memorable, but something all involved would have preferred not to happen. Sort of like Penner’s medivac on “Survivor Micronesia”.

Terry’s exit sets the stage for a reunification back into two tribes. New Bayon is stacked with the challenge beasts, and so Ta Keo goes to Tribal Council. Shockingly, given the opportunity to vote Spencer out, Kass does not do so. Instead, allying with Spencer, Abi-Maria, and Ciera, she conspires to vote out her other original-season player Woo. Once again, the season does a good job with playing with strategic expectations, and keeping us guessing at every Tribal Council. Granted, this does label Kass as “Chaos Kass” once again, and gets her voted out at the next Tribal Council, so possibly not the smartest move Kass could have made. Still, hindsight is 20/20, and it did help keep the season exciting, if nothing else. Plus, Kass does get to make the jury, though I’m not exactly happy as to why. The merge comes in the next episode, with 13 people left. Good for helping ensure fan favorites make the jury, but bad in terms of comprehension. For all that I say Kass’ actions got her the boot, it’s really that she was the easiest person to come to a consensus on. Probably the least interesting strategy we’d seen so far this season, and hard to follow due to the sheer number of players left. Yeah, I get why production merged this early, but it was still a stupid decision.

Speaking of stupid decisions, it’s time to talk about hidden immunity idols. Now that challenges were individual, they couldn’t be hidden at challenges anymore, since it would be too easy to get them with everyone focussed on their own work. Instead, you now found clues that had them hidden in obscure places in or around camp. Not bad, but what we’d seen before, and the difficulty in obtaining the idol varied. Kelley, for instance, would have to crawl under the shelter in order to get her idol, while Jeremy got his second idol just by walking away from camp at night, with little to no risk. The variation in quality just makes the whole thing unfair, and it’s all inherently less interesting to watch than what came before.

Fortunately, the unpredictability that has characterized the season so far continues. After Kass’ boot, Kelley remains on the outs, but uses this and her idol to negate a record-setting (for the time) number of votes, leading to the elimination of Savage. From here up until pretty much the finale, it’s just a series of blindsides, with the groups swinging between “The Witch’s Coven” and other two and threesomes to form what Stephen termed “Voting Blocs”. Again, good for unpredictability, but loses points for overuse of the term “Voting Blocs”. It wasn’t even that original idea. You could argue they were seen as early as “Survivor The Amazon”, or possibly even “Survivor Marquesas”, depending on how liberal you wanted to be. It was a fun watch, but it wasn’t as innovative as the show made it out to be.

That about covers the player-implemented twists up until the finale, but the producer-implemented ones kept coming every couple of episodes. First, players were given the option to step out of an immunity challenge to race for a “secret advantage”. No one knew what it was, and players were given very little time to make the decision. Spencer and Stephen both swam for it, with Stephen ultimately getting the “Steal-A-Vote” advantage, at the time unseen. Powerful, earned in a unique and exciting way, and the potential to flip the game? Yeah, despite what we see in later season, I’d call this one a winner. It even has a funny conclusion, with Stephen stealing Joe’s vote, leading to Joe technically voting for himself, only to himself go home as a result of a split vote. To follow this twist (the vote steal, not the boot of Stephen) up, production offered to build everyone a better shelter (the weather was causing people to basically shut down), if a majority would sit out of an immunity challenge. A decent prisoner’s dilemma, but I would argue not executed well. No real drama came of it, because people had too long to think. This might have worked if we had seen the negotiations, but we didn’t. Most everyone sat out, and Joe won again. Even when he did lose, Jeremy’s aforementioned “meat-shield” strategy kept him safe for a bit. On the whole, while I’m glad the cast was saved from further strife, this was just unnecessary.

And so we come to the finale, a big blowout at first that leads to a predictable conclusion with no surprises. The final six vote came down to a 3-3 split, with both Kelley and Jeremy playing their remaining idols, leading to a 0-0 vote. A revote resulted in a tie again, which would normally mean rocks, but this time would have only one person eligible. As a result, we got to see an actual negotiation for the boot go down, leading to Kimmi’s ejection. A boot so complex, Probst had to chart it out during the reunion show. A little hokey, and I know a lot of people hate on it, but I think it continues the trend of unpredictability that has so far been this season’s greatest strength. Sadly, it’s also the END of that trend, as the rest of the finale goes predictably. While the majority changed at about every Tribal Council, Jeremy didn’t face real opposition until about this point. Fortunately, with Spencer as the omnipresent strategist, and Kelley as the underdog that just won’t die, there was real question about whether Jeremy could win in the end against them. This notion was killed prior to Final Tribal Council, with Kelley eliminated and Spencer being so mean to her before leaving in front of the jury that all chances of his victory were shot. Add onto that Jeremy’s gender reveal of his unborn child at Final Tribal Council, and the vote was unsurprisingly 10-0-0 in favor of Jeremy. A well-deserved victory, but a foreseeable one for at least the last half of the finale.

Despite my complaints, on the whole I would say that this season actually did pretty well in terms of twists. While there were a fair number of misses, they tended to be minor things, or things that only look worse in hindsight. In general, this season had new, innovative twists that largely kept things up in the air, while still being recognizably “Survivor”. In a season that largely focusses on strategy, there’s little more you could ask for.

Score: 9 out of 10.

OVERALL

Aesthetically, Cambodia was and still is a breath of fresh air for the show. Bear in mind that for the previous 12 seasons, the show had been to precisely three countries: Samoa, Nicaragua, and the Philippines. Admittedly, two different areas of the Philippines, but the fact remains that from a visual and cultural standpoint, the show was getting stale. Not a lot new to draw on, making a lot of the seasons blend together in terms of colors and visuals. This would get more pronounced when, shortly after this season, the show made what seems to be a permanent move to Fiji. As such, Cambodia visually feels like the last “Hurrah” of creativity. Stunning vistas, unusual wildlife, and a varied and bright color pallet really help this season stand out on a purely visual level.

That said, Cambodia is a season that suffers pretty badly on rewatch, though not always fairly. Some criticisms simply come from trends started by Cambodia, which I’ll get to later. For now, though, one aspect of Cambodia that I will say doesn’t work overall is engagement. I’m not talking here about keeping interest in the season (we’ll get to that), but to the buy-in of the characters I mentioned earlier. I stand behind the statement that voting in this cast gave those of us voting a lot of buy-in, that let us forgive the weaker aspects the cast may have had. The flaw in this, however, is that it REQUIRES the viewer to be an active participant in the casting process. If you’re someone getting into “Survivor” after this season, or just someone who didn’t vote for whatever reason, the cast seems a LOT weaker. Without that buy-in, a lot of the early boots are forgettable, and even some of the later boots don’t stand out, and you just wonder why they were even shown. This means, in a sense, that this season suffers on rewatch, and as that’s one of my main criteria for overall enjoyment of the season, Cambodia suffers in the rankings for it.

Before we go on, one more word of warning: I can’t talk about Cambodia without talking about the seasons that came after it, as trends there have had a direct effect on the perception of Cambodia as a whole. Thus, I’m going to be breaking my cardinal rule, and talking about the seasons that came after it, to help explain the overall perception of Cambodia. I’m going to talk in very general terms, but I cannot guarantee no spoilers. Therefore, if you have not watched any of the seasons post-Cambodia, I highly encourage you to stop reading here, or else scroll down to the “Abstract” section.

For better or for worse, Cambodia is seen seen as the start of the 30’s of “Survivor”. Technically “Survivor Worlds Apart” holds that distinction, but in terms of buildup and legendary feel, Cambodia really does feel like the start of something new. Thus, it gets to be the standard-bearer for all that happens in the 30’s. And, to put it mildly, the 30’s are not looked on positively by the fanbase as a whole. An emphasis on strategy over character. Strategic game over social game (at least a perceived one; wait until the retrospectives on “Survivor Ghost Island” and “Survivor Island of the Idols” for my thoughts on that). Twists being thrown out with no rhyme or reason. Time taken away from what the viewers want to focus on what production wants. Overall, a perceived decline in the quality of the show, and as such, Cambodia gets a lot of flak for it. And I cannot deny, Cambodia did start some trends that are a negative part of the show. Cambodia, for instance, coined the term “Big Moves”, which has since been used as justification to shift more emphasis to strategic play rather than social play. This was annoying even on Cambodia, and a trend in the wrong direction. As Probst himself used to say, “Survivor” is a social game. Therefore, that is where the emphasis should be. I’ve also mentioned my annoyance at things like “voting blocs”, and having too many people stay too late in the game. Again, these are problems in later seasons, and I can’t deny that Cambodia both started them and suffered for them. Perhaps most disappointingly, Cambodia started the trend of “invisible” players making the finals. To a greater or lesser extent, “invisible” players, or at least players we didn’t get much depth on, had been a part of “Survivor” since the beginning, usually more so in seasons with more players. However, these players usually left in the pre-merge, or the VERY early merge at the latest. With Cambodia? A third of the players in the finale (Kimmi and Keith), were shown as having no chance to win going in, despite reportedly playing good games that didn’t get shown, thus weakening the mystery of who would win. Sadly, given Cambodia’s overall success, production took the lesson that viewers wouldn’t care if a member in the finale had basically no screentime, and thus we saw it more and more, to the detriment of good gameplay. All these things, it’s fair to blame Cambodia for starting.

I think it’s important, however, to remember that Cambodia was actually quite well-received when it came out. Most reviews I saw were positive, and the few that weren’t were more along the lines of “Not my cup of tea” than “The season that ruined ‘Survivor’”. My guess is that production saw these same reviews, said “We want more seasons like this”, but took the wrong lessons from Cambodia. As I hope I’ve emphasized by now, what makes Cambodia great is the unpredictability brought about as a result of the PLAYERS. Production, however, saw that they’d tried new twists, concluded that this was what the viewers liked (along with, again, “Big Moves” and not needing every player in the finale to have a story), and thus threw more and more of them into the game until it became a bloated scavenger hunt instead of an intricate social game. This is something I cannot argue with viewers hating.

What I CAN argue, however, is that Cambodia is not at fault for the decisions of production. Just because production took the wrong lessons from Cambodia does not make Cambodia, in and of itself, bad. Yes, it probably did lead to the inundation of twists we’re now stuck with, but if you look at the numbers, Cambodia didn’t do that much-in game from a production standpoint. We had the two-tribe to three-tribe shakeup. A bit unfair, but new and exciting. We had the steal-a-vote advantage. Led to some good comedy, and didn’t overstay its welcome. And we had them give the players a new shelter after some social dilemmas. Could have been better, but doesn’t intrude on the game too much. We had idols hidden at challenges. Clever and innovative, without adding any new advantages to the game. Yes, despite evidence to the contrary, Cambodia only had ONE new advantage (two if you count the Angkor idol) into the game. hardly the oversaturation we see today. And remember, these twists were popular for a reason. These twists WORKED. Most of them get hate today, not for their content, but for their overabundance. Cambodia does not have that problem. It should not be tarred with the same brush as later seasons just because of dumb production decisions that may have been influenced by it.

Finally, however, there is one criticism Cambodia has had since its airing that cannot be denied. Love it or hate it, this season is very much a “strategy” season rather than a “character” season. I wouldn’t say the season has NO character (I mean, Keith Nale is on it, and he’s pretty much nothing but a character), but the fact remains, as evidenced by the forced Spencer arc mentioned earlier, that this season favors strategy above all else. Personally, as someone who enjoys talking about and dissecting the strategy, I found it engaging and innovative. However, my preferences are by no means universal, and I cannot deny that if you’re someone who prefers seasons with big characters above all else, you will not find much to enjoy in Cambodia. I still think the hate is overrated (just because something isn’t your cup of tea doesn’t make it “bad” overall), but the lack of universal appeal does make Cambodia a rare case where the whole is less than the sum of its parts.

SCORE: 34 out of 40.

ABSTRACT

Cambodia is very much a love-it-or-hate-it season. The emphasis on the strategic is pronounced, and while there’s not no character, fans who primarily want big characters will not find what they are looking for this season. That said, this season is wroth a watch for any fan of strategy, though as so much of this season is seeped in the lore of previous seasons, I would not recommend watching this season early in your “Survivor” viewing career.

-Matt

Idol Speculation: “Survivor Winners at War” Finale: Now We’re Playing “Stupid Survivor”

(This space reserved for the person who correctly guesses the person and season that originated the title quote of the previous blog).

So, this finale was supposed to be three hours, right? Three hours of content? Are you sure we got it? Because it sure doesn’t feel like we did. Despite being literally longer than any finale up to this point, it felt like one of the finales with the least substance left. Let us get through that substance now.

We start off, of course, at the challenge to return from the Edge of Extinction, aka yet another ropes course, aka Natalie gets back in the game. I mean, come on, the woman had three advantages, and had proven she was still a challenge beast this late in the game. There’s no way she was going to lose. Now, the show does its level best to make it look like she might. She gets turned around on maneuvering through the post obstacle, in the process giving a more effective demonstration than anything so far of how draining the Edge of Extinction can be. All she had to do was move forward, and somehow she still got turned around. Wendell, Yul, and Boston Rob all get in there with her, with even Tyson factoring in at one point, but Natalie eventually makes it through, and wins a tight race with Wendell to get back in the game. Well earned for her, but the outcome we all saw coming. There’s approximately 15 minutes down the drain, though admittedly the shot of Probst’s garage was pretty sweet.

And, of course, we have to say goodbye to those who must now go the jury. It’s fairly hard to make this not touching and emotional, and while I give production a lot of flak, they manage to do this part of the episode with grace and dignity. Of course, I’m a snarky internet blogger, so I must accentuated the negative. I could talk about the nice speeches given by the likes of Kim and Sophie, detailing how they’ve grown and what they’ve learned about themselves throughout this adventure. I could talk about how satisfying a bookend it is to end with Ethan, a man who has endured so much in his life, and the earliest winner represented on the show. All these things are marks in this segment’s favor. Instead, though, we’re going to focus on what Amber has to say. All season long, I’ve complained about Amber’s inclusion on the cast, both from a game perspective in terms of sinking both her and Boston Rob’s chances, and from a character perspective. But here, she has a chance to set herself apart, to distinguish herself from her husband, to prove that she’s just as much a player in this game as he is. Does she do this? NO! Instead, she talks about how she played to better Rob’s game, and everything was for him. I appreciate the honesty, and that level of devotion is certainly touching, but I have to say, once again WHY WAS AMBER HERE? We could have had Vecepia, an underrated winner who could have added new, interesting dynamics to the game, and instead we have someone who literally said they were playing for someone else to win. That just feels wrong, particularly on a season as “legendary” as this. And yes, the quotation marks are intentional. We’re going to talk about them much later.

For now, Natalie gets to tour the Koru camp, doubtless changed a fair bit since her last sojourn there in the first two days of the game. Natalie, of course, is in game mode, and sets about bettering her position as best she can. She says she’s going to have to “lie like crazy” in order to build a crack in the dominant foursome, but I’m not sure that she does. At most, she exaggerates. She very publicly tells the group that the people on the Edge perceive Tony as being the one giving the orders, and everyone else just follows orders. From what little we’ve been getting about how everyone’s thinking, that seems like the truth. It’s enough to rankle Tony, however, who kvetches about it to Sarah. As well he should, as he’s effectively being skewered to better Natalie’s chances in the game. Sarah is upset as well, but for a different reason. She rightly sees herself and Tony as partners. She even tots out Trish’s “Tony wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for me.” line from “Survivor Cagayan”. Yet, she’s now being told she’s seen as just a follower, and she not unfairly sees this as a bit of sexism. Remember this. It will be important later.

Ah yes, nothing like a three-hour episode to really dive into the dynamics of the tribe, and with a sixth member added who has barely played with any of these people left, we need to take our time and really examine… Nope, wait, we apparently need to get straight to the immunity challenge! Because that’s what “Survivor” is all about!

Our challenge is the classic ropes obstacle course ending in a puzzle, and an iteration I’m not a fan of. Half the fun of these challenges is watching people trip over each other trying to go through the same obstacle, yet here, with the six divided into two groups of three, there’s almost none of that. Plus, there’s the issue of the water slides, which so very rarely work on “Survivor” and this one is no exception. And, of course, it all comes down the puzzle, a repeat from the final immunity challenge of “Survivor Kaoh Rong”. Michele won that challenge, a fact that Probst calls out. Thus, even when Michele is notably far behind the others, she still has a chance to come back, Indeed she does, as it seems production did not even bother to change the number of the pieces in the challenge, and Michele is basically able to recreate the puzzle from memory. Impressive for her, and certainly nothing unfair about it, but I’m surprised production didn’t charge up the puzzle at least a little to prevent something like this happening.

Credit where it’s due: I was hoping Michele would repeat her kicking down of the puzzle upon winning, and she did so. For this, I am happy.

And now we come to my least favorite part of the episode, which should tell you something about the outcome. No, this is the segment I like to call “Make you favorite winners look like idiots!” You see, Tony, as he has been doing most of this game, plays things smart. He realizes that, given that Chris Underwood came back in with an advantage on “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, Natalie is likely to have one this time around. Hence, the foursome need to split the vote between Natalie and Denise (presumably telling Denise they’re all in on Natalie) to ensure that the person they want goes home. This is a perfectly logical line of reasoning. It is the obvious smart move. And yet Tony is the only one of the four who sees it! Ben, Sarah, Denise, all three of them are adamant that Natalie has nothing, and they should just get her out right now. Much as I like Ben, this is the sort of thinking I expect from him, especially when he admits it’s mostly a ploy to keep Denise around, since he’s trying to focus on his social bonds. Not a bad principle, but Ben, there’s a time to cut your losses, and when it involves burning an idol three days from the end of the game, that time is now. But Sarah and Denise? What are you thinking?! You two are not unintelligent! How can you possibly dismiss the possibility out of hand? Sarah is made out to look the worst of the lot, saying in confessional that she can read Natalie well, and knows she doesn’t have anything, only to cut to Natalie telling Michele about her idol, and the pair gloating about it. Tony tries to talk sense into this alliance, but they won’t have it, and he lets it go. Ironically the one time Tony needs to be forceful is the one time he’s diplomatic. Go figure. Look, we all know Tony is marching to victory at this point, but can you just make his game look good? You don’t need to make the other winners look like morons in the process!

Our first Tribal Council with a now cleaned-up jury is naturally largely focussed on Natalie. Talking about the drama she stirred up, the ethics of the Edge of Extinction, all that jazz that you’d expect. It’s Sarah who throws a curveball into the whole shebang, bringing up her sexism argument from earlier. In simple terms, she says that when a woman lies, cheats, and steals, she’s seen as a scumbag. When a man does the same thing, he’s seen as “playing the game”. A flagrant double-standard, and one that Sarah is absolutely right to point out, even asking to be called “Lacina” by Probst after the whole last-name basis thing comes up. I must say, this particular conversation fills me with a perverse glee. Why perverse? Well, if you’re a superfan of “Survivor” (and I assume you are, if you’re reading this blog after watching this particular season), then this argument might sound a bit familiar to you. Word for word, it’s almost the same argument that Kass McQuillen made about her game. You know, on “Survivor Cagayan”. The season that Sarah was on. And the season where Sarah openly insulted Kass, along with most of the rest of the cast. To see her, even in this minimal way, acknowledge that maybe Kass was right all along? It warms my cold, black, Kass-loving heart. Even Probst gets in on the action, acknowledging his own biases and evolution over the course of the show. Of course, I’d love it even more if he talked about taking actual steps towards addressing it, but it’s a start, and I’m not going to knock his speech too much. What can I say, it was a good speech!

With no split vote coming down, Tony gets the chance to say “I told you so.” to everyone in his alliance. We never got a firm target from Natalie or Michele, but they ultimately went for Ben, who wisely played his idol. Thus, only Denise and Sarah are options on a revote, with everyone besides them voting. With how much Michele and Natalie talked about the need to split Sarah and Tony up, you’d expect them to force a tie, or hope that Ben saves Denise over Sarah, but surprisingly, the revote is unanimous against Denise. It’s a little unclear now as to why, but the show does a good job of explaining their reasoning later, so I can’t blame them too much for this at the moment. As to Denise’s exit; while I can’t deny that her last few days mean she deserved it, and she loses “smart points” in my book for insisting that Natalie had no advantage, I am sorry to see Denise go. She was the last person left who seem to have any shot of winning (I like Michele a lot, but let’s be real, there’s not really a path to victory for her at this point) whom I actually fully liked as a person. The rest? I either don’t like their gameplay this season, or don’t really care for them on a personal level. Not that they’re bad people or anything, just not my cup of tea. Some people click, some people don’t. While I respect all of these people as winners, they just don’t “click” with me the was someone like Denise does. That said, her boot was well-earned, and Denise takes it with good grace, so we can move forward with a clean conscience.

Evidently saying “I told you so.” is not just for Tribal Council, as Tony goes on his rant to Ben and Sarah again at camp. It can’t last too long, though, as Tony has correctly deduced that there’s an idol present in camp, with so many played last night. Thus, he sets out to search in the dark of night, bringing fire in a conch with him to help look. There’s a “Lord of the Flies” joke in here, but I’m not sure what it is. In this case, though, Tony’s manic energy cannot overcome the crushing darkness, and by daybreak he’s still empty-handed. Everyone else joins in the search, culminating in Natalie finding another idol. But no, tell me more about how being on the Edge of Extinction is not an advantage in the game. I mean yeah, Natalie had tons of time to practice looking for and finding things hidden by production, but I’m sure that in NO WAY influences her idol finding abilities, and is DEFINITELY more important than playing the actual strategic game.

While Natalie does a good job of hiding her idol find from everyone outside of Michele for now, Ben and Tony’s idol radars go off, and are suspicious that something’s been found. For now that has to wait, though, as it’s once again time for an immunity challenge. To be fair to the ropes course, while it was lame in comparison to the ones before it, it at least had the epic scale and exciting finish one would hope for in the finale. This is another obstacle course, but it just feels lame. Basically a balance beam and net crawl, culminating in landing sandbags on a disc. Riveting. At least the music keeps us epically guessing, with Tony and Ben dueling it out. Tony narrowly wins, and we head back to camp. It’s here we see why Natalie and Michele voted out Denise, rather than forcing a tie: While they want Tony and Sarah broken up, they think they can work with Sarah. Don’t see why they couldn’t do the same with Denise, and guarantee a breakup of the tightest twosome there, but perhaps Natalie was still bitter about the whole “voted out first” thing, and didn’t trust Denise anymore. In any case, Tony decides to use this to his advantage, asking Sarah to lure Natalie to the area of the “Spy Nest” and get her talking about a potential hidden immunity idol. Sarah does, and Natalie is initially cagey about things, but when called out on the lump in her buff, shows it to Sarah. Evidently it’s Natalie’s turn to hold the “stupid ball”, for keeping the idol on her person in a game with someone KNOWN TO HIDE IN THE BUSHES AND WATCH YOU! DID YOU PEOPLE JUST NOT WATCH CAGAYAN OR SOMETHING? Michele calls her out on this, and feels her own death warrant has been signed. Sure enough, when Sarah spills the beans to Tony, they agree that Natalie is most likely to play the idol on herself, and thus they must vote for Michele. A logical plan, given how preservation-oriented Natalie is. What could possibly screw it up now?

Why, Ben throwing himself on his sword, of course! He talks to Sarah about her speech at the past Tribal Council, and notes that if she wants to vote him off to separate herself from Tony, it’s ok to do so. It’s a sweet and touching moment, fitting in with this season’s strength in emotions, but weird on a season with “legendary” play. I’m expecting all-out, hard core strategic play from each and every person on this season if you call it “legendary”. What we’re getting isn’t bad, but it’s not what I expected. This does give Sarah a dilemma, though. While I agree with her assessment that she needs to do something to separate herself from Tony, voting out Ben isn’t it. Ben is someone she guaranteed beats at the end. She definitely doesn’t beat Tony, and while I think she can beat either Natalie or Michele, it’s an uphill battle. By no means guaranteed. Better to keep your odds good there.

At our Tribal Council, which pales in comparison to the first one with zero memorable moments up until the torch snuff, we see that Sarah makes the dumb decision. Natalie does indeed play the idol on herself, but with three votes against him, it’s ultimately Ben who gets the boot. Can’t say I’m sorry to see him go. While I’m not as down on his win as most are, he is not the most interesting player to me, and as he had no shot at winning this season from what we’d seen up until this point, I’m ok with him going out, if only to make the ending all that much more exciting. Plus, Ben once again continues the trend of memorable exits, hooting and hollering. He even gets a Probst hug! Daaw.

With not real strategy to discuss at this point, we cut straight to our Final Immunity Challenge. Naturally, with a season honoring 20 years of “Survivor”, we go back to the beginning, with “Hand on a hard idol”. Bring it all back to that simple question of “How badly do you want it?” A test of will that will push our final four to their limits…

What’s that you say? They’re going with “Simmotion”? A final challenge that, while difficult, is probably the lamest-looking final immunity challenge ever? Yeah, keep calling this season “legendary”. See if it sticks.

Since this challenge is all about concentration, naturally Tony is out first. Some habits die hard, I guess. Sarah is out next, making our final victor moot, since we know that both Michele and Natalie would send the other two to fire making no matter what. Natalie is the ultimate victor, making some impressive saves, and meaning this season, before pretty good, is now coming dangerously close to “Survivor Edge of Extinction” territory.

Natalie doesn’t tell us who she’s sending to fire-making, though Tony is one of them. Everyone practices fire, leaving Tony’s opponent up in the air as we head out. As I’ve indicated, Natalie’s smartest option is to take Michele to the end. While her iconic line may be “I don’t need to be carried, bro!”, she’s not going to get a choice in this matter. While you have to have one of that dominating duo at the end, there’s no need to risk having both of them, and I maintain, Chris Underwood notwithstanding, that giving up safety to risk it all on a fire-making challenge is a dumb move in general. As such, Natalie relieves herself of the stupid ball, and sends Sarah and Tony to fire-making. Naturally since Sarah was talking before about how she was going to beat Tony in a fire-making challenge hands-down, Tony wins. And this after Natalie and Michele tried to backseat drive Sarah’s fire-making. I get what Natalie was trying to do here. Show herself as being in control of the whole final three, not just two-thirds of it. But by so blatantly favoring one side and then failing, she just makes herself look weaker. Sarah gets a good sendoff, tearfully bidding farewell to her cop buddy Tony, and getting a respectful “Lacina, the tribe has spoken.” to send her off. A nice capstone to the conversation that kickstarted this whole episode. I’m a bit sorry to see Sarah go, particularly after the sexism discussion, but the girl fought hard and can be proud of her performance. That was a really freaking close fire-making challenge.

The Day 39 breakfast means it’s time once again to hear the setup for our final arguments. They’re pretty much what you’d expect. Michele talks about playing from the bottom and proving herself as a winner. Natalie talks about fighting back from being the first person voted out. Tony talks about changing up his game and controlling the vote to the point of never having his name written down. All reasonable arguments, though given what this sort of jury would seem to favor, I think Michele has long odds. Still, you never know.

Give Michele full credit: She argues her case HARD at that Final Tribal Council. Even though, as astute as she is, I’m sure she knew she was fighting a losing battle, she did her best and argued to the bitter end. That is worthy of respect, in my book. Honestly, while all of the final three gave good arguments, I’m inclined to say Tony had the weakest of the three. Not so much because he gave bad arguments, but I feel the real strength of his game was his ability to change up his gameplay from his past two times, and he never really articulated that well. While the jury format still bugs me, with Probst interjecting too much, we did get a couple of iconic moments, something we really haven’t gotten from the jury since the switch to the new format. Yul’s stage fright. Jeremy calling out Tony on his supposed “Loyalty”. Boston Rob taking everyone to task for pretty much everything. Ben bonding with Michele over their “controversial” wins. And, of course, Danni’s nice summation at the end, culminating in a round of applause for the final three from everyone. A perfect capstone to this sort of moment. Really, the only sour note at this Tribal Council was the implication from the jury that Natalie should have fought Tony in fire-making if she wanted to win. Again, see my comments above about how that’s a stupid move and a needless risk nearly at the end of the game.

There were two ways this blog could have gone down. We saw a couple of Natalie votes, and a couple of Tony votes. No Michele votes (unfortunate, though I can understand why) means that either Natalie or Tony must win. While I do like Natalie overall, her win after being voted out first would have put this season in the same category as “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, a category it otherwise does not deserve to be in. This season is head and shoulders above that season in nearly every aspect, but if the outcome was that unsatisfying, I would have had no choice. Had that happened, you would not have gotten a recap blog. You would instead have gotten a 4,000 word rant about how evidently nothing that happens on “Survivor” matters anymore. Thankfully, the jury does the sane thing and awards the check to the guy who changed up his game the most in the ways that he needed to. While it was fairly obvious post-merge that it was Tony’s game to lose, the dude still played his butt off, and for the most part was able to stave off his old ways that got him an early boot on “Survivor Game Changers”. Those rare times he did dip back into his old gameplay, he was able to win immunities to take him through the danger zone. Hell, I’d even argue he played a perfect game. Dude never had a vote against him, and while he didn’t sweep the jury votes, it was a 16-person jury, and he still got 12 of them! That’s more than the other “perfect games” of J.T., Cochran, and arguably Jeremy. I think the dude deserves to be in the “perfect game” category at least as much as Jeremy does.

With no reunion show to talk over (though regarding the reading of the votes, I must say Michele cleans up nicely), it’s therefore time to talk about the season as a whole. Perhaps ranking it so soon after its end is a fool’s errand, but as a snarky internet blogger, I am duty-bound to do so anyway. That said, this is one of the hardest seasons for me to rank, since there’s more going into it than just a regular season. Do I judge it against the other returnee seasons? They keep talking about this as a “legends” season, should I judge based on my preconceptions of what that is, or what we got? Should how well it honors “Survivor” history be a factor? Or should I just judge it like any other season, based on how I feel and what seasons I feel similarly about? But isn’t that doing this season a disservice? After all, even if the execution was not “legendary”, the premise is. Do I then create a separate category for this season? Well, that just doesn’t seem fair to the other seasons, then.

Let me preface what I’m about to say with this: “Survivor Winners at War” is a good season. I daresay it belongs in the top half of “Survivor” seasons, easy. It had more heart, more genuine emotional moments than pretty much any other season, and it milked the unique premise for all it was worth. There were some stumbling blocks. The back half of the season in particular had issues. The outcome seemed fairly obvious, even if the path there wasn’t, and while the Edge of Extinction was indeed more tolerable on this season, having 19 people throughout the entire season really stretched the time limits, and made everything feeling rushed and unexplained. But for me, the big problem with this season is the marketing. Over and over, we hear about how this is a “Legendary” season, with the best to ever play. I’ll agree the PREMISE is legendary, but I don’t feel the gameplay was. I hear “Legendary” season, and I think of something like “Survivor Micronesia” or “Survivor Cambodia”. A season where, with little to no push from production, new and innovative strategies are brought forth, with unpredictability from week to week as to who goes. This season definitely had decent strategy. No marks against it in that category. But “legendary”? This just felt like pretty standard strategizing for a season of “Survivor” at this point. Nothing new really came from the players, save for the occasional person like Tony changing up their game. On a macro level? All pretty much standard. The only new dynamics came from the fire tokens, and while I’m ok with them as a twist, the fact that they come from production dampens their appeal, and thus they don’t feel like the “Legendary” strategy I felt we were promised. Even more insulting when you consider Probst, talking in this very episode, about “Putting the best of the best out there and letting them go at it.” If that’s what you wanted THEN WHY DID YOU PUT SO MUCH FOCUS ON THINGS OTHER THAN THE STRATEGY OF THE RETURNEES? Oh sure, we had some moments that could be called “Legendary”, but they were all either related to the emotions of the game, or just due to everyone trying to be respectful for the milestone season. The post-Tribal Council hug was a good example of this. It’s good, sure, but it’s not what you come to “Survivor” for. Then again, should marketing count against a season? It’s not related to the game itself, but intrinsically linked to the experience. That’s why this season is so hard for me to rank.

I considered a lot of places to put this season. I considered ranking it around All-Stars, as sort of polar opposites (All-Stars does a good job paying tribute to the history of “Survivor” while being painful to watch; Winners at War vice versa). I considered ranking it around Ghost Island, since I feel both share a major flaw (the outcome was obvious and it felt like no one did anything to stop it when they had the power to do so). However, both of these rankings felt wrong. Too low for a season that gave us such a different and overall enjoyable experience. For being such a different animal, I considered ranking it alongside Borneo, as both feel like they don’t belong with the rest of the seasons. That felt too high though, as again, Borneo is legend, and I’m sorry, but this season isn’t. In the end, in order to find a ranking I was satisfied with, I distilled this season down to its greatest strength, and its most prominent flaw, marketing aside. For strength, this season, by virtue of its premise, gave us new interpersonal dynamics and hyped up the emotion of the show, while still feeling genuine. On the downside, this season was bogged down by a twist that didn’t need to be there, and took up enough time that the latter half of the season in particular felt rushed. Thus, for me, this season falls just below “Survivor Blood vs. Water” in my season rankings. Both seasons that are objectively good, but dragged down by an objectively bad twist that did not need to be there. It’s a close call which I would rank higher, but given that “Survivor Blood vs. Water” gave us new players to return on later seasons, thus keeping the dynamics more fresh, I’m inclined to give it the edge. Until I change my mind again.

Well, with all that business out of the way, let’s see how much of an idiot I am, and compare my pre-season assessment of the players to how they actually did!

ETHAN-While not as high-and-mighty as I feared he might be, the dude was an early boot, and just couldn’t get in the groove he needed to make it deep. I’ll give myself the win on this one.

SANDRA-Again, right. Not given the time of day, and out earlier than ever before. Mad respect for sticking to her guns with her opinion of the Edge of Extinction, though.

AMBER-Well, she was the first one voted out of her tribe, and with Natalie re-entering the game, was TECHNICALLY the first boot, so again, I think I can fairly give myself this victory.

DANNI-Wrong. I’m still not sure exactly what happened, but the cool and collected stealth bomber of Guatemala was replaced with someone who seemed out of their depth. No disrespect to Danni, though. Hope this doesn’t dampen future Guatemala returnee prospects, though.

YUL-Wrong. Dude just had to let his nerd flag fly, and get voted out earlier than I thought possible for it.

PARVATI-While she didn’t return, and was much less cutthroat than I expected, she still went out about when I thought she would.

BOSTON ROB-He was kind of a shield, but he still went out earlier than I thought, and was never really in any sort of power. Can’t really say I was right about him.

SOPHIE-My lucky guess paid off. She was able to fit in quite well, and made it almost exactly as far as I thought. Sometimes I amaze even myself.

KIM-Wrong. That charm couldn’t keep her off the bottom, or get her into power. She’s still one of the most dominant winners ever, though.

DENISE-Wrong. If there could have been an under-the-radar winner this season, it would have been her.

TYSON-His threat level was higher than I though, and he was out earlier than I expected as a result. Another one for the “Wrong” column.

TONY-Wrong. For all that I don’t like the hype that’s built around him, dude did change up his game in the ways he needed to, something I’ll admit I thought impossible for him to do. Mad respect.

NATALIE-I knew pairs would be targeted this season, but I didn’t expect her to be the first casualty of that by a long shot. She was quite good at the Edge of Extinction, though.

JEREMY-He used his shields, but with less success, and went out post-merge. I slightly underestimated him, but was overall still right, I’d say.

MICHELE-While not eliminated per say, she still made it about as far as I thought she could. I’ll give myself this one.

ADAM-I called his personality, but he stuck around far longer than I would have thought he would.

SARAH-She had a real shot at winning, and made the very late merge. Yep, that’s wrong on all counts!

BEN-A much hotter commodity than I gave him credit for. Like Adam, I think I nailed his personality, but was wrong on how long he would be in the game.

WENDELL-Right with no qualifiers, for once.

NICK-Wrong. Dude hung in a lot longer than I though.

And there you have it, the last “Idol Speculation” of the season. And, contrary to Probst’s optimism, probably the last one you’re going to get for a while, given filming delays due to COVID-19. But that doesn’t mean you’ll see me go quiet! I’d like to get “Survivor Retrospectives” going again to tide us over, and I’ve got even more ideas for “Survivor What-Ifs” Plus a couple of special one-offs to help tide us over until we get another hit of the sweet, sweet, “Survivor” juice, whenever that may be.

And, of course, for the last time this season, I ask you to identify the quote that made the title of this blog. Post the name of the contestant and the season the quote came from in the comments of this blog, and I’ll be sure to include your name at the top of the next regular “Idol Speculation”, whenever it finally comes back. A friendly reminder that I only use quotes from US seasons of “Survivor”. And with that, I bid you good night.

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.

Idol Speculation: “Survivor Winners at War” Episode 13: Slash, Burn, and Salt the Earth

Congratulations to user AubreyDeservedToLoseKaohRong for correctly identifying the last blog’s title quote as coming courtesy of Cirie Fields, circa “Survivor Micronesia”!

As we’ve got a two-hour episode (more or less) to cover, we skip any sort of clever introduction, and start right off with the fallout from the previous Tribal Council. Jeremy laments to the universe that he’s always the target, and wonders why this is. Well, Jeremy, perhaps it’s because you’re a likable challenge threat with a ton of friends on the jury. Shield strategy or not, that fact doesn’t change, and having now one with that strategy only makes it more obvious. I understand a bit of self-pity given the situation, but at least be realistic self-pity.

More pressing is the 50/50 advantage that Jeremy is still holding. Michele asks for it back, and Jeremy unsurprisingly acquiesces. I can definitely see some people calling it a bad move, particularly given how this half of the episode works out, but honestly Jeremy had no choice here. Even if he stubbornly held onto the advantage, he loses his only true ally in doing so, giving him no bargaining power, and at best a SHOT at safety for one Tribal Council. Better to give it back and try and work something else out.

Bamboo shots echo in the morning, and a cut to Ben might have you believe we’re back on “Survivor Heroes vs. Healers vs. Hustlers” and about to have an emotional moment. The emotion will be there, but not from Ben. Instead, Denise has found her moment of zen, talking about wanting tattoos of “Endure” and “Let Go”, one on each hand, to help symbolize her desire to keep going in this game, but her acceptance if it doesn’t work out. She settles for painting it on a board instead, which is probably the longer smart-term decision. Probst is probably cursing right now that he never became a licensed tattoo artist so he could boat out to camp and offer to tattoo Denise on the spot.

In keeping with the theme of humanizing moments, we cut to Jeremy and Tony having an argument about how many days are in a week. Yes, really. This is a point of contention in the world of Tony. He considers the week the work week, while Jeremy counts the weekend. I would point out how stupid this is of Tony, but it’s clear from their demeanor that the two are just having fun, bringing up the traditional cop/firefighter rivalry you sometimes hear about. It’s all in good fun, and like Denise’s moment earlier, really helps humanize the contestants.

Strategy is never far from Tony’s mind, however, and so he and Sarah go off to talk about who should go next. Tony wants to keep Jeremy around as a number, and is worried if he goes that the “hyenas” will come after players like himself. Geez, I thought we’d killed this metaphor! Look, I understand what Tony’s getting at, but I’m tired of the talk of “lions and hyenas”. There’s just only so far you can go with that metaphor, and I want some variety. I like “The Lion King” as much as the next guy, but there are limits, people! The pair eventually settle on Nick, as he doesn’t have them as part of his endgame strategy, and as a consensus boot. The trouble with this is that Ben really wants Jeremy out, and as Sarah puts it, Ben needs to be in the driver’s seat at least some of the time, or he’ll betray them out of sheer frustration. Thus, she talks to Ben, trying to convince him that HE wants to vote out Jeremy. At least, that’s what she TELLS us she does. What we see is her outlining the reasons Nick needs to go, rather than letting Ben come to that conclusion on his own, thinking it was his idea. Still, it seems to work, partly because Ben is not as emotional a player as others make him out to be. Ben is on board, and the plan is set. The only way this could possibly go wrong is if Nick wins immunity.

Shock of all shocks, this challenge plays to Nick’s strengths! Players must toss a ball into a gutter, then race underneath said gutter to catch the ball, with trip bars along the way. They then dig under a post to get to a slide puzzle, which they must solve to win immunity and two fire tokens. This is where Tony’s win streak comes to an end, I fear. Puzzles have always been his Achilles’ heel. Remember that one slide puzzle where he just slid any piece he could with no rhyme or reason? Probst certainly does, and will bring it up over and over like Tony is Will Wahl (“Survivor Millennials vs. Gen-X”), and the puzzle is alcohol. To his credit, Tony has at least improved his puzzle technique, if not his results, working slowly and methodically. Nick still wins, but it’s a further testament to how Tony has changed up his game from the first time out. Kudos for that. We even get in one more humanizing moment, with the whole tribe going in to comfort Michele, the only one who couldn’t get to the puzzle, and breaks down crying because of it. This might seem odd until you remember that a string of immunity wins helped propel Michele to her original victory. It’s one thing she has to be proud of, and having such a big loss as a result can only be devastating.

Also, say what you will about this season, but it has bucked the recent trend of immunity winners being irrelevant. Granted, we now have the equally predictable “The person who needs immunity wins it.” trend, but at least it’s different.

Back at camp, we initially settle on a consensus boot of Denise, thereby assuring us that Denise will survive this Tribal Council. After all, when this season was the first name thrown out the name anyone actually went with? No, the issue here seems to be that, while Ben has a final three deal with Sarah and Tony, he also sees Denise as a number for himself, and doesn’t want her to go. Ok, when did Denise become a number for Ben? Moreover, when did Ben get into a final three deal with Sarah and Tony? I’ll tell you when. Pregame alliances. Word on the street is that Ben in particular is someone everyone wanted to align with coming back, and so he was a part of a number of deals. Denise falls into a similar category. All this is fine, except that it makes these narratives seem to come out of nowhere. Suddenly these people are aligned, and the show acts like they’ve always been aligned, even though it was never shown until now. And I’m not naive; I know that pretty much every returnee season has some form of pregame alliance going in, but at least those seasons made an EFFORT to conceal it. They gave us some reason, however cockamamie, that the alliance came together. That’s far more than what I can say we got here. Yes, folks, even with a two hour episode, we STILL leave out crucial information. Don’t get me wrong: what we got in exchange, particularly the emotional, private moments with the players, is great. But this should not be an either/or situation, particularly with the extra-long episode.

Getting back to the strategizing, the reluctant decision is made to go for Jeremy, splitting the vote (guys for Jeremy, girls for Michele) to ensure that the 50/50 advantage doesn’t screw anything up. But then Ben tries to get cute. He wants to make absolutely sure that Michele does not play her advantage on Jeremy, and so decides to pit them against each other. He tells Jeremy to ask Michele for her advantage, then privately tells Michele that Jeremy is after her and will ask for her advantage to make her vulnerable. On paper, this is actually a fantastic plan. Cover your bases, and make the person you most want to go home go home. Artfully done, it can work wonders. Look how Ken Hoang (“Survivor Gabon”) effectively turned Sugar against Ace with a similar move. The flaw here is that this sort of move requires artistry, and Ben, as we’ve established, is not subtle. Ken Hoang he ain’t. Jeremy and Michele of course compare notes about the obvious ploy, and so set things in motion against Ben. With the way the split vote will work tonight, they just need one guy to turn against the group to gain the upper hand. Nick is their go-to guy, pitching the Ben vote out.

Nick thus finds himself in the swing vote position, and really has no wrong choice. On the surface, Ben would seem the obvious choice to go. Nick wants to be in with Tony, but with the final three deal we talked about earlier, Nick’s only shot at that is to take out Ben. Plus, it takes out an idol with him, making for less confusion, as Nick points out. However, Nick’s not necessarily going to see it that way, and for perfectly legitimate reasons. He presumably doesn’t know about either the final three deal or the idol, and so voting out Ben is merely voting out an annoyance. Meanwhile, you’ve pissed off several people for betraying them, and find yourself in a 3-3 split rather than a solid majority. Granted, Denise probably flips back with you, Michele, and Jeremy in that scenario because she’s not stupid, but still, no need to rock the boat unnecessarily. Again, hindsight is 20/20, and I’m sure many will say that Nick did a dumb tonight, but for my money, both decisions were a good one for him.

Like so many before it, this Tribal Council is a good microcosm for this episode as a whole. What it lacks in excitement it makes up for in heart. We don’t get the theatrics we’ve become accustomed to on this season. Indeed, even Probst comments on how subdued things are. The stand-out moment, then, is Probst talking with everyone about their PTSD, and trouble trusting once they come back from the game. Ben, Jeremy, and Nick all give very moving speeches about how hard it was to trust anyone when they returned from the game. Again, it goes a long way towards humanizing these contestants, and shows us a side of them we don’t normally get to see. I’m all for it. That, plus good mystery as to who goes, gets this Tribal Council a good grade from me. Michele uses her 50/50 advantage on herself, which I applaud her for doing. In these uncertain times, it’s the only smart move, but one that doesn’t ultimately help her much, as we’re about to see.

In the end, Nick decides to go with what the audience knows is the worse move, but the better one from Nick’s perspective. Yes, Jeremy is gone, and while I like the guy, I can’t say I’m too sorry. The trouble was just how much his name kept coming up. If this storyline came up over and over again, we’d eventually become numb to it. Jeremy left at just the right time to keep his boot interesting. He unsurprisingly wills his tokens to Michele, and then heads to the Edge of Extinction.

Koru, following that performance, decides to show us the entire emotional spectrum. On the one hand we have Tony and Jeremy giddily celebrating a successful move pulled off. The fact that they each have an idol is a plus, as now they’ve got even further safety. Contrast with Michele, who decides to give us a crash course in “pissed off”. She literally states that she wondered if Nick would have “The balls” to come and talk to her. Strong language, Michele! Children watch this show! In all seriousness, Michele has some good insight here, pointing out that Nick now effectively has no way to the end. He may not have seen the Ben-Sarah-Tony final three deal, but Michele certainly has, and with no bargaining chip to sway Denise, their options are limited.

Thus, Michele does what I wished the entire tribe of Zapatera would do for the post merge of “Survivor Redemption Island”, and throw caution to the winds. With basically no prospects, she decides to wear her heart on her sleeve, and hope to stir up enough resentment at camp to make something happen. A risky strategy, but with the majority seeming to be this solid, I’m not sure Michele has a better recourse. Sarah becomes Michele’s primary target, mostly because she rises to the bait so easily. The pair get into an argument, and just when I think Michele might be going a bit far, she dials it back and brings up a good point. She notes that Tony is the one seen to be in the driver’s seat, and so will be the one to win in the end. Sarah counters that he’s not the only one, but Michele correctly points out that perception is all that matters (hence Adam’s win on “Survivor Millennials vs. Gen-X” despite very few of his plans actually working), and Tony is the one seen to be calling the shots. An avenue of conversation that might not have opened up had Michele not goaded Sarah into an argument. Sarah takes this information… and runs straight to Tony with it. Ok, I know Tony has been playing well overall this season, but why is everyone around him acting like an idiot! I could understand giving him a pass when he was keeping himself calm, but when he started going back to his usual mode of operation? And now seeming to be playing circles around everyone? Why is Tony only NOW being brought up as a target? It’s not like everyone knows about his idol. There’s no reason NOT to target him when he’s immune.

Sigh. We cut over to the Edge of Extinction, get our moment of zen with Ethan and Yul meditating, before cutting over to our scavenger hunt for the day. The clue indicates that everyone should look for a “Throne of Stone”, which sounds like something out of Authurian Legend. Surprised they didn’t save that one for a season with Coach on it. Wendell gets out into a lead in the race for it, but Natalie uses her superior knowledge of the island to locate the correct rock. I’ve said before, and I will say again: Natalie is KILLING the Edge. She seems to have found her element, and is holding up surprisingly well given her length of time out of the game. Natalie’s advantage is another one to sell to a player. Basically, the player who buys it can hold someone up in the immunity challenge. Who gave the disadvantage will remain anonymous, but this late in the game, such things do not come cheap. The player it is ultimately given to, Nick (there’s a bit of debate, but as those on the Edge see those left as one big glob with no real animosities, it’s simply a matter of “who can give us the most fire tokens”) is charged 8 tokens, outpacing the six he has. Tony’s broke, meaning Nick turns to Michele. Her elation on hearing he has an advantage turns to disappointment when she hears exactly what it is. After all, it can’t exactly make someone immune. However, since there’s not much else to spend them on, Michele coughs up the tokens. Nick says he’d like to use the disadvantage against someone who would take it poorly, and likely cause chaos at camp. I’d personally go for Tony, in that case.

At our challenge, we find out that Ben got the disadvantage. Not a bad call for causing chaos, and given that Nick has taken over Jeremy’s mantle of “Hating Ben”, I can understand the temptation. That said, I think Nick is going to wish he had given it to Jeremy, for reasons that will become clear after the challenge. The challenge itself? The domino chain challenge first seen on “Survivor Gabon”, with this particularly lame iteration coming courtesy of “Survivor Kaoh Rong”. A flat platform, and only leg trip wires for the platform. This challenge was much cooler when it was, you know, challenging.

Case in point, this challenge is so easy that Ben, who had his platform lengthened due to the disadvantage, still managed to come in a close second. And Ben is not exactly known for his dexterity or ease of movement. Who does win? Why Michele of course, continuing once again the trend of the person needing immunity winning it this season. Michele makes a point of noting that no one claps for her win, leading to belated, half-hearted clapping. Good social observation there, Michele. I mean that sincerely.

This is why giving the disadvantage to Ben (who does try and find out who gave it to him, but was rebuffed by Probst) is a problem for Nick. Ben was so close on that challenge, it’s fair to say he would have won but for that disadvantage. If he wins, Michele most likely goes home. However, with Michele winning, Nick is now the primary target. He’s oddly happy about it, since he sees it as something happening in the game. Guess the poor guy really can’t read the room, can he? He certainly can’t see through Denise, who makes a big show about being the obvious target, and just wants a full meal of rice before leaving, offering to spend her remaining tokens on more rice. Can’t fault that, since Probst said today was the last day for them to spend tokens on anything. Denise tells us, though, that she’s running a false flag operation, and the plan is to go for Nick. Fair enough, but I have to say, I think she oversold it. The others seem to buy it, though, so good for her.

With Nick now firmly in the hot seat, what could give us some mystery? Why, Denise ACTUALLY becoming a target, of course. Tony once again returns to his spying roots, and it pays off. Denise, Sarah, and Ben all have a conversation at the water well, where Denise proposes a final three deal between them. She correctly argues that Tony is unbeatable at at the end. We don’t see how they react, because we have to follow Tony. He correctly surmises that this means Denise is a threat, and needs to be taken care of. He and Sarah discuss the possibility of actually going against Denise tonight. Definitely a threat to be aware of, but with someone from Edge of Extinction on the horizon to return, I’d say it’s too risky to pull off tonight. Trustworthy or not, Denise is a loyal number for now, which is more than can be said for Nick. Vote her out, and it’s all too easy for the Edge of Extinction returnee to strike up a final three deal with Nick and Michele. It’s beneficial for all involved. Thus, you must risk a rock draw, and while Tony and Ben have idols, why take a risk you don’t need to? With Denise still in the game, the Edge of Extinction returnee has nowhere to go. Granted, this overheard conversation does mean that for Tony, Denise needs to go sooner rather than later, just perhaps not at the final six. And no, I’m not just talking as a Denise fan here.

Tribal Council is once again subdued, and with good misdirection, but unlike the first, there really is no stand-out moment. We do get a good dissection of Denise’s vernacular in her attitude towards the game at this point, but that’s to be expected. Unexpectedly, Nick goes home, probably the first time this season the obvious boot went home. I’m not sorry to see Nick go. He was never one of my favorite winners, and this episode really drove home how out of his depth he was. The man was just completely unaware.

We cut to the Edge one final time, as Amber gives a fairly touching bittersweet farewell, capped off with everyone cheering “See you never, Edge!”Nick talks about wanting to win his way back in, but that will be an uphill battle. You see, you need fire tokens for advantages in the challenge and Nick, now voted out, has none. A few players, like Boston Rob, Tyson, Yul, and Parvati are able to buy themselves an advantage in the challenge, but they pale in comparison to Natalie’s three, plus an idol, due to her whopping 14 tokens! And that’s not all! Remember those idols she and Rob bought for the previous challenge? Those are still good! So Natalie actually buys an idol FOR TYSON! WHAT?

Ok, this is the one thing this episode that really pisses me off. Why are those idols still good? They were paid for for the initial challenge! After that they should be done! Kaput! Start from scratch. Make like on the Edge, and coming back from it, challenging! You know, CHALLENGE? THAT THING THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE ENTIRE POINT OF THE EDGE OF EXTINCTION? REMEMBER THAT? Yeah, show, you’re really not selling yourself well that this is anything but an excuse to keep from losing early favorites.

Our last 10 minutes or so are devoted to a recap of the season, and a preview of what’s to come. When I saw this I was initially annoyed, feeling like we were cheated out of other content, but since this is usually done for the finale, I can’t be too mad. I will be if they do it again at the start of the next episode, but if not, I’m ok with losing 10 minutes of this episode to gain 10 minutes of the next one.

Speaking of gained minutes, that’s really the crux of what I have to say about this episode. If there’s one problem plaguing the show since the post-merge, it’s lack of time. Everything feels squished and condensed with so many people left in the game, and storylines and alliances just seem to come out of nowhere. Take Natalie giving Tyson an idol. Why Tyson? When did they specifically bond beyond just being two more people on the Edge of Extinction? We saw more of Natalie and Parvati together than Natalie and Tyson. Why did Natalie not buy an extra idol for Parvati? For that matter, when did Ben, Sarah, and Tony form a final three deal? WHAT IS GOING ON?

Ahem… Anyway, point is that I’m not sure how long an episode needs to be in order for the story to make sense, but two hours clearly isn’t enough. Still, this episode did give us good heartwarming moments, and even bits of levity, which have so far been this season’s biggest strengths. I’ll get into this more next week when I discuss the season as a whole, but this has been a strange season, to say the least.

Normally this is where I’d talk about who is most and least likely to win at this point, but like on “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, I feel like I can’t do that. The returnee from the Edge changes so much, it seems a disservice to do so now. So, why not do what I did for that season, and list my most likely people to come back from the Edge? Simple. There’s not ranking to it. It’s going to be Natalie. Three advantages aside, she’s got the narrative of thriving on the Edge since the beginning, and has shown even in this episode that she’s still challenge dominance material. So no, no one else has a shot. It’s Natalie. Natalie. Natalie. Natalie.

Natalie is not the person who gave us this blog’s title, however, and it’s up to you to find the correct person! In the comments, give me the name of the person who gave us this week’s quote, and what season the quote was said on. The first person to do so gets their username posted at the top of this blog. I will see you in a week to talk about the finale, and the season as a whole.

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.

Idol Speculation: “Survivor Winners at War” Episode 12: Little Ozlettes

Congratulations to user bwburke94 for correctly identifying last episode’s blog title as coming courtesy of Devon Pinto of “Survivor Heroes vs. Healers vs. Hustlers”!

Well, ladies and gentlemen, we have a new show topper. As befits a “Legends” season such as this, we have referenced an element of seasons past, but done it to a greater extreme than we have in the past. I’m talking, of course, about the area of romance. We’ve seen the loving relationship between Boston Rob and Amber develop of the course of “Survivor All-Stars”. We’ve seen the multiple PDA’s of Amanda and Ozzy on “Survivor Micronesia”. We’ve seen countless contestants, as Malcolm Freberg so eloquently put it on “Survivor Philippines”, “Go booty blind.” But now, we have a love story to trump them all. I’m talking, of course, about the romance blooming between Ben and Tony. Look at them, ladies and gentleman! That is a full-on bridal carry we’re seeing from the happy couple! If that isn’t the epitome of love, I don’t know what is!

Don’t believe me? Despite being blindsided at the last vote, Ben takes everything in stride. He compliments Tony on a blindside well put-together, and asks for an explanation. While Ben does later admit to not trusting Tony, this is actually about as good a reaction overall, and I need to give the guy credit for it. Lord knows Jeremy won’t. The man once again goes on about how Ben was once his ride-or-die, but is now not even talking to him. Tony also gets in on the action, saying that Ben took the blindside poorly. Is there just something we’re not seeing here? From what I’m getting, it looks like Ben is a pretty textbook example of how to handle a blindside.

Contrast with Sarah, who clearly shows us how NOT to handle a blindside. Sarah tells us that before talking to Tony, she told herself to calm down and not fly of the handle. This is immediately contrasted with her constant swearing, along with her and Tony talking over each other heatedly. While neither burns the bridge completely, as both want to continue working with the other, neither fully trusts the other at this point. This sends Tony in particular into a panic, forcing him to come clean to Ben about his idol to build trust. Ben admits that he doesn’t fully return Tony’s trust, but isn’t ready to throw him out just yet. Jeremy needs to go first.

Speaking of Jeremy, we get to see more of Ben’s supposed “hatred” of him the following morning. Jeremy asks Ben how he slept. Ben responds “Good”, and goes to have a wash in the ocean. Jeremy complains to Kim, along with pretty much anyone within earshot, about how this means that Ben can’t stand him, let alone hold a polite conversation! The evidence is there to see! He… answered your question then went off to do something that’s a part of many people’s morning routines… Ok, Jeremy, I’m really not getting the “Ben hates you.” vibe you’re saying is there. Maybe it’s just because of how obvious his animosity was towards Adam back when Adam was still in the game, but it really seems like Ben is at worst indifferent to Jeremy. Jeremy tries to set Kim on the anti-Ben path, but Kim has other ideas. Kim is still not happy to have Tony in the game, especially given the connection between him and Sarah that is becoming more obvious by the day. As such, she wants him gone, and so starts talking up the idea to some people.

More on that later, though, as we have to go over to the Edge of Extinction! Yes, why delve deeper into the tribe dynamics of the players still in the game, particularly when they aren’t named Tony, when we could talk about the people who managed to get themselves voted out! Hell, we don’t even spend any time on the “toughness” of Edge of Extinction, as we’re too busy earning fire tokens. In a callback to the log-moving challenge which Ethan makes blatant, everyone must move a pile of coconuts from the back of the island to their shelter, one coconut at a time. Not a bad challenge to call back to, but this one is a definite downgrade. While I get making the challenge easier by removing the vertical element, since it cause medical to come out for Ethan, making it a race is a move I can’t get behind. When you had the focus be on endurance, you could follow individual stories, and get involved in the individual struggles as each player worked to accomplish the goal. By making it a race, the interest now comes in who’s ahead and behind, something hard to follow in a marathon, particularly one without clearly defined paths to follow. As such, we’re mostly told who is and isn’t doing well, with some individual stories sprinkled in there. Adam, of course, acknowledges that he is not cut out for this challenge, though the show feels the need to rub salt in the wound by cutting back to him having trouble over and over. One confessional would have been enough. Boston Rob gets an early lead, but manages to take a bad fall and damage his elbow, causing no small amount of bleeding. Still, the man finishes the challenge, even if he doesn’t place. According to him and Amber, this is to show that he “never gives up”. Because that was ever in doubt? Natalie and Sophie finish first and second, respectively. Unsurprising for Natalie at this point, but good for Sophie. Yes, she had a few challenge wins under her belt from “Survivor South Pacific”, and yes, she was probably better fed than most anyone left, but even so, a second place finish is quite impressive, especially over some of the athletes on the Edge of Extinction. Yul comes in third, while Tyson and Parvati take a combined fourth place. The only real “race” is between Danni and Wendell for sixth, which Wendell takes. All winners earn two fire tokens, which is good for them, but I feel that better scenes could have been had back at the camp.

Or perhaps not, as what we’re treated to at the Koru camp is Tony’s advertised “Spy Nest”. It’s underwhelming to say the least. Even if you’re not a big fan of the Spy Shack or the Spy Bunker, you can at least admire the effort that went into making them. The “Spy Nest” is… Tony climbing a tree. A decent feat of strength, to be sure, but not on the same level as the previously mentioned spy hideouts. To add insult to injury, the only person we see him encounter is Sarah, who knows that he’s there, and tells him to get down. He does, but the two still have an argument on the beach regarding the previous vote. Nick overhears this, and takes it as his cue to start whittling down the threats, and make an end-game alliance for himself. Said end-game alliance turns out to be himself, Michele, and Denise, a sort of “level playing field” as Michele calls it. Got to admit, the alliance isn’t a bad idea of any of them. Since the alliance is fundamentally anti-Tony, it gives Nick and Michele something to boast about in the endgame, while giving Denise a chance to coast, and hope her ouster of Sandra is enough to net her the win. They bring in Kim and Ben as a fourth and fifth, mostly because of also being anti-Tony. This ramps up the strategy discussion, as pretty much everyone but Jeremy and Sarah (and Tony, of course) is now on board to get rid of Tony. Nick in particular is an impressive swing. I’d have said Sarah before Tony, given who he’s blindsided and not blindsided so far. But hey, kudos to Nick for not being too tied down in this game.

This interesting strategy is then interrupted by an idol hunt. Again. Maybe the people who complain about idols have a point. At first it just seems like a Tony and Ben hunt, but then most everyone else joins in. I must admit, while this episode does not have the same humor as the last one, Nick returning to a significant knot in a tree and saying “It’ll be here one of these days.” got a chuckle out of me. We do take time out of the hunt to clarify Ben’s position on Tony. While Ben does open up a bit more to Tony, saying that Kim his after him, he doesn’t give away the whole alliance, showing that he’s willing to work with Tony, but doesn’t fully trust him. This is further proven by Ben trying to hide his idol find from Tony, which doesn’t work. Ben comes clean, and the pair celebrate, the actual reason behind the aforementioned “bridal carry”. So help me, I already used the “chocolate and peanut butter” quote for a previous blog, and the “Ozlettes” confessional is one of my favorites! I just had to use it!

Oh, right, I suppose I should explain how the chocolate and peanut butter thing plays in. Our immunity hallenge today is “When it Rains, it Pours” from “Survivor Africa”. you may remember this as the challenge where people have to stand with their hand above their head, and attached to a bucket. Falling or dropping the hand leads to a soaking, with the last person standing winning immunity, and in this case, fire tokens. Also, the last man and woman standing each win immunity Because that makes so much sense this late in the game, and in now way detracts from the victory. Still, this challenge is a classic we hadn’t seen in a while, and definitely deserving of being on an all-winners season. Shame none of the people who’d played this challenge before could play, but oh well.

Ah, but this challenge is tougher, for you see, now you cannot support yourself with your other hand! OOOH! Ok, to be fair, this definitely DOES make the challenge tougher, I just don’t think it’s quite the game changer Probst does.

Of course, this challenge is best known as one that regularly offers food temptations. Ben requests chocolate and peanut butter, though he does not go full Jenna Morasca and Heidi Strobel and offer to strip for it. Indeed, Ben misses out, with Kim and Michele stepping down. This hands Denise immunity as Sarah had previously dropped. As for the men, the temptation is there for both Nick and Tony, the two men left. Tony, however, is determined to continue his win streak, and Nick’s drop out is bought at the price of one fire token. A move he will later regret, but it’s too late to take back. This, once again, means our first episode half is almost entirely focussed on Tony, and once again, is mostly pointless. Now to be fair, this episode does do a much better job than the last one, as there ARE plot points already established that don’t specifically revolve around Tony. Jeremy and Ben’s feud, along with the formation of the Nick-Michele-Denise alliance are both such points, and both help buoy this episode up. Plus, I can’t fault the show for focussing on Tony, since he is such a big character.

Really, my issue with the Tony focus this episode is less because it makes for a bad episode or because it’s undeserved, but really because it’s a disservice to everyone else left. Look, Tony is a big character, even an enjoyable one, but to focus on him to the exclusion of others is really a detriment. As “Survivor Samoa” demonstrated, it takes more than one player to make for a good season. And while the other players have their moments in their own right, it feels at times like there’s Tony, and then there’s everyone else. Part of that is just sheer energy level. It’s hard to compete with Tony in that department. The issue is not with showing Tony. The issue is with showing him to the exclusion of everyone else. This is a LEGENDS season. These are all great players. We should be getting ALL their highlights. Despite my earlier comparison to “Survivor Samoa”, I think “Survivor Ghost Island” might be the more apt comparison here. You see, “Survivor Samoa” had a weak cast overall, so it made sense to focus more on Russell Hantz than anyone else. “Survivor Ghost Island” had an interesting cast throughout, but instead mostly focussed on Wendell and Domenick to the exclusion of all others. Again, this is a LEGENDS season. These people must be giving you some good bits. You can still show the highlights of Tony, but give us more from the others so it doesn’t just feel like “The Tony Show” all the time. Some people aren’t that big on Tony, or at least want some variety in the show. Not to mention, if you keep teasing the “Tony’s antics catch up with him plot” only for that not to happen, there’s a feeling of letdown. Further, this limits your storyline to one of two outcomes: Either Tony wins, in which case the focus on him makes sense, but makes your conclusion way too obvious (“Survivor Ghost Island” at least had the benefit of some mystery of who would win out between Domenick and Wendell), or Tony loses, and this plotline is being dragged out at the expense of the other players.

Ok, ok, rant over. There’s actually good stuff in this episode, so let’s talk about it. With Tony immune Nick and Kim admit that their plan to get him out is now “on the back burner.” As such, they must decide on a new target. Sarah would be the obvious choice, but Kim has a bond with Sarah, and so doesn’t want her to go. Thus, we default to Jeremy, who seems to be the consensus boot. Only Michele expresses any disappointment at needing to vote him out, and as she herself admits, there’s not a lot she can do. We need misdirection, though, and in comes Tony to provide. Ben opens up to Tony a bit more, and admits that Nick was in on the plan to get him out. He also says that Kim is still rallying the troops. Tony does the logical thing and checks in with Nick, who gives the worst performance of the episode, feigning a memory lapse as to why he didn’t talk to Tony. He lets his alliance know about Ben’s slip, but the damage is done. Tony wants Kim out, which he pitches to Jeremy, naturally, but also Ben and Sarah. This… is actually a really smart move on Tony’s part. While Ben is a part of Kim’s alliance, he also has somewhat of a relationship with Tony. And even if he doesn’t want to work with Tony down the road, voting out Kim would effectively give him her place in the alliance, and keep around another player (Jeremy) who can compete with Tony in challenges. If you’re Sarah, well, Tony’s your ally, and thus voting out the player continually targeting him is a good move. Unlike last episode, where there’s room for debate about whether this was a smart or a dumb on Tony’s part, this is clearly a smart. About the only person who might be upset at the ouster of Kim would be Denise, who has a history of not caring if her allies get the axe. Thus, no bridges burnt, unlike last episode.

That said, there’s only four, and Nick’s not budging on voting for Jeremy. Jeremy, for his part, tries to talk Ben around, but to no avail. Salvation seems to come in the form of Michele’s 50/50 advantage, which she gives to Jeremy. A bit of a risk, since she might need it next episode, but again, Michele doesn’t have much incentive to keep Kim around, and if it buys her another close ally (albeit one without any real power) so much the better. Whether or not Jeremy will play it is our mystery as we head off to Tribal Council. Once again, it’s a whisperfest, though one done better than the previous couple we’ve had. There are two key reasons why. One is Probst’s horse-race-like commentary as people start getting up, which was brief, but hilarious. More importantly, we actually get subtitles this time around, thus making the whispering easy to follow. We’re left in the dark on some specifics, to keep up the mystery, but we get a general sense of the movement. Tony is a bit too blaze in talking to Jeremy about doing something, which makes Kim paranoid and start double-checking with everybody. Soon Jeremy and Tony are doing the same, which leads to paranoia about a Sarah vote, and Sarah begging for an idol play. This also brings into focus that Nick and Ben are our swing votes tonight, which will help make the result clearer in a bit. Not the most exciting Tribal Council ever, but a fun, clear journey for once, and brought to a fantastic bookend with Denise shutting everyone up, in a tone that clearly says “I’m about order, and I’ve had enough of this mess.” That said I do have to dock Denise points since it does seem to piss off Jeremy.

In a contrast to our last standoff, no one actually plays an advantage. Tony announces his idol (I’d say Tony did a dumb by revealing that he has an idol, but from what I can gather from the conversations we heard, it was already public knowledge), and intends to play it for Sarah, but Sarah talks him down. Jeremy nearly plays the 50/50 advantage, even getting egged on by Tony, but decides not to. Since we saw even Michele vote for him, I figure this dooms him. Jeremy must have known something we didn’t, though, as he only receives three votes, Kim going home with five. It’s not entirely clear how it happened, but given that Nick and Ben were presented as the swing votes, I’d say they flipped to the side they were more confidant in. Tony may be chaotic, but he is good at projecting the image of confidence, and sometimes on “Survivor”, that’s enough. Kim may not have been the biggest character this season, but she was one of the titans in terms of gameplay from her first season, and that ouster deserves respect. She may never have had a foothold in this game, but like Aubry on “Survivor Game Changers” it’s impressive that she made it this far at all. She splits her three fire tokens between Denise, Sarah, and Michele. Classy.

This season is getting better, though I’m still not satisfied. We’re seeing more of the other players, but overall this still feels like “The Tony Show”. Don’t get me wrong, “The Tony Show” is definitely entertaining, but I came to see “Survivor Winners at War”. I would like to see more people than just Tony. As such, it’s time for another…

TOP 10!

Yes, I normally do “Top 5 and Bottom 5”, but this list does not lend itself to looking at the negatives well. You see, we’ve had a couple of memorable exits this season. From Adam’s “Always” to Sophie’s crotch idol, these people have had exits that stick with us. Granted, Kim’s is not winning any awards, but the next two episodes are extra long, and I’ve been mulling this subject over for a few weeks, so let’s talk about the best exits the show has ever seen.

A couple of ground-rules before we start. One exit per season. I don’t want this list to half come from the current season. “Exit” in this case will refer to anything that happens between Probst saying “I’ll read the votes” and Probst’s final words of wisdom (or fire token willing, if need be). Anything else in that area (idol plays, exit confessionals, Probst’s words of wisdom) deserve lists of their own, and thus will not be considered. Also not considered will be the context of the vote out itself. This is purely the reaction to the votes being read, and the torch snuffing. Only proper vote outs will count. No impromptu Tribal Councils, quits, or Advantagegeddons will be considered. Finally, the reaction can come from anybody, not just the person being voted out. Other than that, anything goes, including placement of the player voted out. No separate lists for first and last vote outs or anything. Let’s get things started with…

10. “No.” (“Survivor Kaoh Rong”)-First entry on the list, and already I’m cheating. Yes, technically idol plays are not considered here, and most of what makes the elimination of Scot Pollard interesting is centered around an immunity idol. That said, the idol was never actually played, and the interaction that makes this so memorable did happen in the time frame specified. With Scot and Jason being such cocky villains, seeing them taken down a peg is just so satisfying. Their looks of dejection just make this a very satisfying exit to watch. Plus, there is hilarity in seeing Probst dwarfed by a contestant. I keep it this low since it more a reaction to a lack of an idol play than a vote, but still a fun moment nonetheless.

9. “I’ve been Bamboozled!” (“Survivor All-Stars”)-From the beginning of “Survivor All-Stars”, it was clear that Richard Hatch had zero cares. He knew he wasn’t going to win, and so was just there to screw with everybody. And what better way to cap it off than with an obviously-faked over the top surprise reaction to a vote he knew was coming? The man even did a little dance on his way out of Tribal Council. Always good for bonus points. It goes a little over-the-top for my taste, but still enjoyable nonetheless.

8. “ONE MINUTE!” (“Survivor Exile Island”)-I was tempted to put the ouster of Dan from this season in this spot, but that one really requires the context of the whole episode to have meaning. Instead, we turn to Shane. Not exactly the most “stable” of contestants, you knew when Shane’s time came, it wasn’t going to go quietly. Sure enough, Shane gave us his characteristic outburst upon leaving, turning back from Probst to rub it in everyone’s faces about how he was going to be eating an ice cream bar soon. Delightfully childish, though admittedly somewhat subdued by Shane’s standards. I expected him to mock the votes as well, and this comparatively underwhelming performance prevents the admittedly memorable final line pre-torch-snuff from landing higher on the list.

7. “DAYUM!” (“Survivor China”)-In most of these cases, the longer the reaction, the better. It’s not enough in most cases to give a pre-snuff speech. You need to talk through the votes as well, or at least have a conversation. Sometimes, though, all it takes is a word, and less is more. Chicken’s “DAYUM” is one well-remembered throughout the “Survivor” fandom, and iconic enough on it’s own to need no further embellishment. Simple and clean is the way that this reaction is.

6. “At least you made the jury.” (“Survivor Cambodia”)-I’m no fan of Abi-Maria’s, but when her snark is directed at a full-of-himself Andrew Savage, I’m much more ok with her. While this is technically related to an idol play, Savage still reacted to the votes with despair, and took his eviction of very few votes with his usual grace and maturity. And by that, I mean he had a bit of a silent tantrum, even flipping off the remaining players as he left. Not very classy, but satisfying to see Savage brought so low after being so high-and-mighty most of the game. If an exit can make me like Abi-Maria, then you know it’s a good one.

5. “Two ‘B’s’ Guys” (“Survivor Thailand”)-Ah, now we get into people commenting on the votes as well as the result. Admittedly, a lot of the impact of the boot of Robb Zbacnik comes from the character development he had gotten over the course of the show. Even without it, though, there’s humor to be found in his need to call out every spelling mistake made with his name. Every. Single. Time. Apparently, the name “Robb” with two “B’s” was just too much for the Sook Jai tribe. Robb, if your reading this, take comfort in that I remembered the second “b” in your name.

4. “Sheep to the Slaughter” (“Survivor Game Changers”)-Tony is known for never shutting up. Sandra is known for never taking an insult lying down. Put these two together, and you’ve got yourself a recipe for a memorable exit. Tony’s declaration of the idiocy of his tribemates is nothing new, but Sandra’s need to taunt him as he exits elevates this to a knew level. To use the old cliche, they argue like a married couple. Plus, this was the birth of “Queen stays Queen”, and it deserves respect for that.

3. “Who flipped?” (“Survivor Cagayan”)-Ah yes. Perhaps the most iconic post-vote conversation to come out of the latter half of “Survivor”. You knew Sarah’s boot was going to be on the list somewhere. Tony’s over-the-top reaction to the outcome and imitation of Spencer made this one memorable on its own, but it had so many other great moments. Sarah’s simple inquiry as to who flipped, leading to the slow realization that Kass was here for the Chaos. Spencer’s iconic “0 chance of winning the game.” remark. Kass’ flippant “There’s a lot of game left.” response. All iconic, and all worthy of a spot on this list. The only reason it isn’t higher is because it kind of leaves an unpleasant aftertaste, given the vitriol occasionally directed at Kass.

2. Penner’s Dance (“Survivor Philippines”)-Forgive me for stating the blindingly obvious, but Jonathan Penner does not take anything seriously, least of all his third exit from “Survivor”. Not content with merely mocking Probst, Penner decided to mock the music as well. Dancing his way out of Tribal Council ia always a plus, but he (badly) tried to whistle the usual music that plays over an exit. Then, just when you think he’s gone. He comes back again. And again! Hilarity! It even left Probst at a loss for words; that’s bonus points! So, what keeps it from the top spot? The way it was shot. I know shooting in the dark is hard, but it’s REALLY hard to see Penner’s dance once he gets on the trail out of Tribal Council. I only really saw the full thing in edited pictures with the exposure changed. That made it funny, but shouldn’t be necessary for full enjoyment. That said, there was also his refusal of a hug from Abi-Maria which gets my respect. And yes, this entry is why Sarah Dawson’s kiss didn’t make the list. Had I allowed multiple entries from the same season, it would have been on here for sure.

1. “Scumbags” (“Survivor Guatemala”)-Maybe it’s just my love for “Survivor Guatemala” bleeding through, but this to me is the quintessential “Pissed Off” exit. No rage. Nor breaking of things. No gnashing of teeth. Just quiet, cold fury. You don’t need to see Judd’s rage. you can feel it through your tv screen. All all delivered in the trademark Judd style. Admittedly, no “man” in there, but you can’t have everything. Still iconic nonetheless.

And with that said, it is time to end off this blog. But it is not the end for you! Once again, I’m looking to see who can figure who said the quote this blog draws its title from and the season! Simply comment the name of the person who said this quote, and on what season! First person to do so gets their username listed at the top of the blog. As a reminder, U.S. seasons only, so don’t overtax yourself, and I’ll see you next week!

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.

Idol Speculation: “Survivor Winners at War” Episode 11: That is NOT an Advantage

(This spot reserved for a respondent who correctly guesses the name and season of the player who provided the title quote for the blog).

Subtly, our show starts off showing a shadowy silhouette, sitting silently by the stove. Yes, I know it’s a fire, but “fire” doesn’t start with an “s”. This is Jeremy, eagerly awaiting news of who was voted off. While waiting, he informs us that he was of the philosophy of “don’t leave with an advantage in your pocket”, as well as him getting a bad vibe at the last Tribal Council, hence why he left. I can’t fault either part of that logic, though it still doesn’t change the fact that Jeremy’s name is now “mud” with his alliance. Sure enough, Jeremy can only find out about Tyson’s exit by counting who comes back, as no one is giving him anything. Compounding the issue, Jeremy takes up the mantle of “Adam”, and gets into an argument with Ben over pretty much nothing. Ben keeps mum, and Jeremy gets frustrated. Privately, though, Ben does confirm that Jeremy was the target, meaning he was right to leave. Ben also tells us that his five is solid, and seems like it can ride to the end. If you think this means the winning fivesome is getting through this episode unscathed, then I have some beachfront property in Kansas to sell you…

BOOONG!

Oh, that loud reverberation you just heard through the internet? That we be Probst hitting my “anti-break-in” defense shield. I had it installed after the last former player crashed through my wall. I knew reusing that joke from “Survivor One World” would get Probst running her to blabber on about Kansas, and wanted to test my defenses. Moving on.

Jeremy is not the only one butthurt about this vote, though he is the only one to link it back to “meat shields”. Look, I get that it’s good strategy, but man does it get annoying when he comes back to it over and over again. Kim and Michele are also quite upset. Kim is understandable, of course. She wasted an idol, lost the vote, and is now down in numbers. Not the position anyone wants to be in. But Michele is a bit out of left-field, since an analysis of the votes after the fact tells us Michele actually voted for Tyson, meaning she was on the right side of the votes. Now, this could lead some to argue that the way the votes were split last episode made since, since the minority could not have more than two votes to use (Denise’s vote being stolen, and Michele voting with the majority leaves only Tyson’s and Kim’s votes to worry about). After all, if they had Michele on their side all along, they could only throw two split votes and still be safe. I say if so, they did an exceedingly poor job of showing this, and it doesn’t seem like that was the case. Michele, you see, is very upset at being “left out of the vote”, something that seems odd for someone who voted with the majority. My conclusion, therefore, is that Michele saw which way the wind was blowing, and guessed correctly so as to not be on the wrong side of the vote in terms of numbers. Smart move for Michele, but again, it begs the question of why not split the vote 3-3. Anyway, Michele and Kim stew, but can’t really do too much at this point.

Besides, they don’t have to! Tony is going to do everything for everybody now! Yes, for all that I’ve praised the man for controlling his more manic tendencies, and having improved game performance as a result, one can only hold in that much manic energy for so long, and 27 days is Tony’s breaking point. With an idol played at the last Tribal Council, he figures that one must be hidden again, and so goes looking for it. I’m all prepared to break out my argument from “Survivor Heroes vs. Healers vs. Hustlers”, and ask why no one thought to set a guard or a tail, but then Nick comes in to save the day. Yeah, I never thought I’d type those words either. Nick has also got up early for idol hunting, and tries to spoil Tony’s plans. Tony, however, sends him off to hunt by the water well, and gets back to work himself. Jumping ahead a bit, Tony finds the idol, so inarguably his strategy worked. However, Tony sending off Nick isn’t going to get praise that easily. You see, this plan so easily could have gone off the rails. We have no indication that Tony had already searched the water well area, and there is a precedent for idols being held there. Tony might very well have sent Nick off straight to the idol, and screwed himself with that move. He didn’t, obviously, but the potential was there. This is like his move on “Survivor Cagayan”, where he gave Jeremiah a useless idol clue to put a target on his back, only to need to rush back and take back the clue since it could be easily called out as not belonging in the camp. It’s hard to argue with the results, but it so EASILY could have gone awry. This is why I’ve never fully gotten behind the “Tony is a genius” movement. He’s a good player overall, to be sure, and definitely brings the entertainment, but so many of his plans succeed through luck rather than foolproof strategizing that I just can’t give him too much credit for them.

We enter back into the game on a very human moment. As an internet critic, I am therefore obligated to snark at it. What’s that, Sarah? Being smart, fun, AND pretty isn’t enough for you? You need people to know that you’re creative? Having three envious, talented traits isn’t enough for you? Oh, you poor thing! Boo-stinking-hoo!

For all my snark, this is the second-best scene in the entire episode, and then only comes in second to a scene so hilarious it demands your attention. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Sarah has managed to cobble together a clothing line out of the materials they have, and so puts on a fashion show. Michele and Kim work as the models, while Sophie acts as MC, complete with a coconut microphone. It’s not laugh-out-loud funny, but still humorous, and makes up for it in a heartwarming human moment with our players.

Too bad Tony has to ruin it! Continuing on with the “Sarah and Tony rift” storyline that’s been building over the past couple of episodes, Tony snarks at Sarah’s fashion show. She brushes him off, and we instead see how Tony gets his kicks. The answer, apparently, is lying to people’s faces. Tony still wants Jeremy gone, but of course doesn’t want Jeremy to know that and try and pull something. Thus, someone needs to pretend to be a flip vote, and Tony, channeling his newly rediscovered manic energy, agrees to be that person, spinning a lie to Jeremy, Michele, Kim, and Denise about wanting to vote with them, but not being able to until now. Tony admits that he’s not an undercover cop, and so isn’t used to this, but his lie seems enough to convince Jeremy and Michele, since they talk privately about how good this is for them. Less convinced and Kim and Denise, since they’re the smarter of the foursome, and admit to wanting Tony out Good for them.

Over on the Edge of Extinction, we at first seem to be setting up for someone to leave, only for it to just be Tyson giving a very roundabout pep talk to Wendell. Then there’s some shade thrown at Adam, because it’s Tyson, and he can’t get through a sentence without ragging on somebody. Instead, we go to the old “Edge of Extinction” standby of “Sell an Advantage!” Natalie finds a bottle in the sand, with Parvati close behind. The pair find a clue to an advantage. It’s cryptic, but seems to indicate crawling and giving up. Naturally, the pair search as far away from the “give up” sail as it’s possible to go before realizing “It’s under the shelter.” I give them crap, but in all honestly that clue was pretty cryptic. Plus, they now face the challenge of getting everyone out of the shelter when no one has any incentive to do so. Parvati suggesting watching the sunset somehow works, and so Natalie gets the “advantage”. I use quotation marks, because this is really the “Survivor” equivalent of “GIVE US YER CASH!” They give the advantage to a player in the game. That player must pay an amount of fire tokens set by the finders of said advantage, or else not play in the immunity challenge, and not vote at Tribal Council. Steep stakes, especially when one has very little time to pay. Natalie and Parvati now have two considerations: How many fire tokens can they get, and who would be manic enough to try and scrounge up more?

Sure enough, after another heartwarming and humanizing moment where Nick talks about his negative reception during his season (being called “Vampire Donathan”, after Donathan Hurley of “Survivor Ghost Island”, who while a good player I like, I’m AMAZED got brought up on a legends season like this), we jarringly cut to the craziness that is Tony. This, without a doubt, is the funniest and best scene in this episode. Watching Tony’s excitement build and build in that little-kid way that only little kids and Tony can pull off is a delight. Then to see it all come crashing down, and the complete 180 of his mood? The cherry on top of the whole thing.

Natalie and Parvati want six fire tokens, and while they made a good choice of who to extort, the fact remains that Tony only has three tokens, and thus needs to get more. Worse, he needs to do it before the immunity challenge. Then Denise comes in with something called “Tree Mail”. I would tell you what that is, but honestly, I can’t remember the last time we had something called “Tree Mail” on this show. That’s how long it’s been: Even I, the “Survivor” fanatic, can’t rattle off this piece of trivia.

Needless to say, Tony has his work cut out for him. Tony first tries to beg off the people he’s convinced he’s with when he’s not, Michele and Jeremy. Michele, having none to give, spins Tony a lie about an “Extinction Advantage” as to why her tokens are gone. Frankly, it’s cockamamie, and I’m amazed Tony buys it. Live by the flimsy lie, die by the flimsy lie, I suppose. Jeremy is a little more generous, but still only gives one of his two tokens, showing that Jeremy hasn’t bought Tony’s lies quite as much as we think. Tony is able to bum two more off of Nick and Ben, promising to pay them back. Now, this was relatively easy for Tony. As such, you might even think it pointless. We don’t even see Natalie and Parvati buy anything with the tokens. But I say, no. This was a great use of advantages and fire tokens. The best twist play with the social and strategic game, and this definitely did that. Not only is there strategy and social game in play in who gets targeted with the “advantage” (strategy in how many fire tokens to get, social in the potential use of “you screwed me, so I will set an impossibly high cost so that you can’t play in the challenge or vote”), as well as in how you get out of it. Tony had to rely on both his friendships and his lies in order to dig himself out of a hole. A hole he didn’t dig, for once, but a hole nonetheless. Still, for at least having the potential to enhance social and strategic gameplay, this “Extortion Advantage” gets the “Idol Speculation” Seal of Approval. It is anything but pointless.

What IS pointless is our immunity challenge. Oh, not the outcome. Tony wins, and since Denise and Kim were targeting him, this will have some impact. Plus, now Tony can pay back two of his debts, since he won two fire tokens at the challenge as well. This creates a dilemma as to who he does and doesn’t pay back. After all, one person will be pissed no matter what, since they know Tony has fire tokens. We won’t see this dilemma play out or get resolved, but rest assured, it’s there. No, Tony winning makes the episode so far almost entirely pointless. You see, this episode had REALLY been playing up the “Tony goes back to his old ways and crashes for it.” narrative. It’s a good narrative. Solid, foreshadowed, and spectacular. Admittedly predictable, but when your flameout is this great, who needs misdirection. The flaw in building up this narrative is that no other outcome then feels satisfying, and that’s what we have here. Sure, we got a couple of scenes with people other than Tony, and I’ve tried to highlight them, but the fact is, the first half of this episode was “The Tony Show”, and so Tony not even being able to be targeted means that there was almost no point to what we’d seen so far. Of course, the show still has approximately half an hour to build up a new target, but then this brings us back to the problem of last episode. If you cram everything into the last half hour of the show, it feels rushed and wanting. Show, if I may offer some constructive criticism, EITHER GIVE US LONGER EPISODES, OR DON’T WASTE TIME ON STUFF THAT, WHILE ENTERTAINING, DOES NOT IMPACT THE PLOT! HALF AN HOUR IS NOT ENOUGH TO BUILD UP STRATEGY AND TARGETS IN A GAME AS COMPLEX AS THIS!

Ok, ok, rant over. Jeremy is the obvious target, since we know that he was meant to be targeted last episode. It’s revealed here that Michele is really the only one tight with him, as both Kim and Denise are more than willing to jump ship and vote out Jeremy. As such, the controlling five agree to throw two votes on Michele, just in case, while the remainder vote for Jeremy.

Jeremy’s counter-plan is not exactly the stuff of legend. With no wedge to drive, he decides to throw votes on Ben, because he annoys him. The tried and true reasoning for wanting to get rid of someone. That said, it’s not likely to win hearts and minds. What does sway things is Tony’s craziness, and here’s where it comes back to bite him in the butt. True, Tony’s true nature has reared itself, and while he’s taken some risks, it’s been nothing game-ending. It won’t be game ending tonight, either, since he’s immune, but now Tony has put himself in a losing situation. All Tony had to do was follow the example of Keith Nale and “Stick to the Plan”. He had a good setup. An idol, and a powerful fivesome he has inroads with. However, Tony’s got the itch to make a move, and so decides, for really no good reason, to vote out Sophie. Oh, he does GIVE a reason, it’s just that reason is stupid. Tony is only NOW concerned with how close Sarah and Sophie have gotten, and decides to target Sophie so that Sarah will be close to him. Now, you might wonder why this is stupid. After all, I praised this when Jeremy tried to off Nick to make Wendell close to him? Well, aside from the fact that that praise was qualified, with so many people left, Jeremy could have plausible deniability. If Nick had gone, he could have comfortably denied it, with no way to contradict him. With so few left now, though, Sarah could probably tell that Tony had turned on her. Do you think this will end well for Tony? I thought not.

Tony may have to make the smart move in spite of himself, however. Jeremy is not too trusting, particularly since Tony’s story involves him believing that both Kim and Denise have turned on him, which is a little far-fetched. That said, it DOES mean that after two more blogs, I can finally talk about the proper move here. Jeremy and Tony both have obvious best moves. For Jeremy, getting out Sophie breaks up the majority and gets rid of one of their idols, both of which he desperately needs right now. For Tony, as I’ve said, sticking with the Jeremy plan is the right move. No need to rock the boat at this juncture, especially when you’re so likely to get caught with your hand in the proverbial cookie jar.

Apart from Tony, everyone else has been kind of low-energy, and as a result we get a low-energy Tribal Council. Even Probst’s questions seem lazy, with him basically asking multiple people if they felt ignore, focussing on our supposed targets for the night (Jeremy, Michele, Ben, and Sophie). I’m sure he asked everybody, but asking in exactly the same way feels lazy. Vary it up a little!

Despite Jeremy having the most foreshadowing, I’m pretty sure Sophie will be going home tonight. It feels like it’s time, somehow, and we’ve been building to an epic Tony blunder. Sure enough, the split vote screws the majority, and Tony, Nick, Jeremy, and Michele band together to vote out Sophie. The right move for Jeremy and Michele, but Tony and Nick still lack an upside. Naturally, I’m upset to see Sophie go. Her snark was always good for a laugh, and apart from Denise, she was my favorite player left in the game. So, does this mean she has “Ethan Zohn” downside, in getting voted out without limited foreshadowing? Not exactly. While most of the foreshadowing was crammed in the back half of the episode, there WAS foreshadowing there, so Sophie’s exit does feel earned. Stupid move for some, but earned nonetheless. I think the better comparison is to Christian’s exit on “Survivor David vs. Goliath”. You get why it happened, but the player it happened to was all but invisible in their boot episode. That said, Sophie has the decency to give us some comedy on her way out, pretending to get lost on the way to the snuffer, and complaining about crotch idols. She has to decide who didn’t betray her when willing her fire tokens, and so sends one apiece to Sarah and Kim. Smart choices all.

For all my complaints, this episode is an improvement. It was entertaining, even laugh-out-loud funny at times, and that’s always appreciated. Really, my main gripe is the gripe I always have with an “Edge of Extinction” season: it’s too crowded. Trying to fit too much into an hour time slot just leaves things feeling rushed and convoluted. This episode is better than some that have tried, but the show REALLY needs to make some deep cuts if they want things to be foreshadowed before the last half-hour again.

But flaws in the episode doesn’t mean we can’t have fun! My contest to identify the speaker of the title quote is still ongoing! Simply write the name and season of the player who spoke the quote used for the title in the comments! First to correctly get it gets their username at the top of the next blog. Remember, one entry per person, and I only use seasons of US “Survivor”.

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.

Idol Speculation: “Survivor Winners at War” Episode 10: Baby, Baby, Bee-Bee, Bee-Bee

Congratulations to user “AubreyDeservedToLoseKaohRong” for correctly identifying last episode’s title as a quote from Brian Heidik of “Survivor Thailand”! Let’s see if we can keep the streak going.

Unfortunately for us, a major win must be followed by a major loss. Yes, it’s time once again for another edition of…

MATT’S MESS-UP!

Appropriately enough for a chaotic Tribal Council, a couple of points got lost in the shuffle. First and foremost, I forgot to properly eulogize Adam. While I did an adequate job defending his play of the podium, if I do say so myself, Adam as a player kind of fell by the wayside. His departure really brings up mixed feelings in me. While Adam is a skilled player, and very much earned his win on his first season, he was clearly here to represent the “Superfan” first, and represent a winner second. In that sense, his boot was well-deserved. It was a long time coming, being brought up as early as the first episode. And again, while I mean no disrespect to Adam as a player, as a result of coming across more as a superfan, he just didn’t feel as “legendary” as the other players on this season. That said, having what was basically a representation of those of us watching at home on the show was nice, and in that sense, he will be missed. If nothing else, Adam can hold up his head with dignity.

Secondly, I want to bring up the music of last episode again before we get into the music of this episode. I, like most everyone else, gave the show flak for having music with English lyrics for no discernible reason in the immunity challenge. However, I forgot to call out a bit where the music was actually helpful. During that chaotic Tribal Council, Adam at one point asked for a response to his question about being targeted. Up until this point, the music had been building in intensity, doing a perfect job of underscoring the chaos. As soon as Adam asks his question? Dead silence, except for some crickets chirping. Genius. Well played, music department. I still haven’t forgiven you for that earlier song, but it’s a start.

Yes, Adam is a player deserving of a long period of mourning. As such, let’s completely ignore the fallout from his exit, and cut straight to the loved-one’s reward challenge! Well, I say “challenge”, but as a bit of a treat for these legendary players, everyone just gets to take their loved-ones back for a feast. A bit of a cop-out? Sure, but the moment has a lot of warm fuzzies, and it would have been kind of cruel to the young kids to get so close to their parents only to be torn away again. Oh yeah, that’s the other special thing about this reward. With so many players having young children, the show (and Fiji Airways, as Jeff goes out of his way to tell us in a segway that in NO WAY detracts from the moment) sends out loved ones, and children, where applicable. It’s a cuteness overload not seen on “Survivor” since the baby monkeys of “Survivor Cambodia”, and I am all for it. Plus, in a weird, roundabout way, it helps to honor the legacy of the show, by showing how long it’s been going on in the progeny produced even by more recent winners.

With that said, I do have to say that having so many loved ones out there for most did make it odd for the people who DIDN’T have children to come out as well, those being Sophie, Nick, and Michele. It’s no mark against them, of course, but it did make them stand out in a bad way, and almost seem like an afterthought at their own reward. So, how could you balance the scales? For my part, I would have thought they’d get basically a second loved-one, kind of like what they did on “Survivor Caramoan”. They don’t have kids, so they get a second person to help balance the love scales. Hell, they could even have tied it into the theme of the season, and brought back friends/allies from a previous season for each of them. Think about it. We could have gotten Probst’s Cochran cameo out of the way with Sophie here. We could have seen the return of Christian or Angelina for Nick. AUBRY-FREAKING-BRACCO COULD HAVE GRACED OUR TV SCREENS ONCE AGAIN FOR MICHELE! WHY ARE YOU NOT MAKING THIS A REALITY, CBS?

Even amongst those with children, however, there are a few standouts. While I’m sure this will be a point of contention for some, for me, the most heartwarming reunion was Tony, simply because this is a side of him we hadn’t seen before on the show. The man started out as the wild and crazy guy on “Survivor Cagayan”, and basically maintained that through “Survivor Game Changers”. We’d seen his more patient, more overtly strategic side come out this season, and now we get to see his emotional, fatherly side. It adds depth that, in my opinion, Tony desperately needs, and he’s the only one left who hadn’t gotten it yet. True, some other people didn’t get it until this season, but even so, Tony is still the last, and it was gratifying to see. Speaking of people getting new sides to them, while Tyson’s reunion touched on the family beats we’d seen from him before, we did get to see him interact with his daughter, which I have to say was adorable. Plus, Tyson FINALLY got in some self-deprecating humor, which if you’ve read me for a while, you know has been a major hangup of mine for Tyson as a character. This isn’t enough to make me love Tyson or anything, but it does start me on the road to liking him more than I had previously. Finally, I want to touch on Jeremy’s reunion, not to talk about the reunion itself, but the music with it. In keeping with the throwback to older seasons, Jeremy’s music cue is a sort of soaring choral piece that hearkens back to the very earliest days of the show. I can’t say off the top of my head that it was used in “Survivor Borneo”, but I know for a fact it was at least as early as “Survivor Africa”. For reference, it’s the music cue that plays during Tom Buchanan’s Hot-Air Balloon reward when he talks about having his horizons broadened by the experience. If you’re looking for another place to find the music cue to hear what I’m talking about, it also plays during the “Rites of Passage” for “Survivor Pearl Islands”. I do very much enjoy most of the new music on the show. Note my love for the new voting theme used on “Survivor Island of the Idols”. But even with that, I still hold a fondness for the old music cues, and wish they would come back more often. On the scale of things I would want brought back to “Survivor”, it’s pretty low. Final Twos, the old jury format, intros that actually PLAY before the episode, rites of passage, gross food challenges, food auctions, and individual character introductions in the first episode, are all things I would take over getting the old music back. That said, I’m not going to complain about us getting the old music back.

So yeah, Probst spills that this is just a reward, no challenge, and everyone goes off and is happy. They laugh. They party. Tyson’s daughter makes “sand soup”, and their interaction around that is just adorable. Time for some mood whiplash on the Edge of Extinction. A boat arrives. Ethan, in an uncharacteristic display of pessimism, says that something bad is coming. Ethan, man, this does not become you. Fortunately, Ethan is wrong, as the people on the Edge of Extinction get their loved ones as well! Ok, I may sound heartless and cruel, but I’m not happy about this. That is to say, I’m happy that the players on the Edge of Extinction are happy, but I feel like this is too much. Apart from the fact that we’re nearly halfway through the episode and aside from some warm fuzzies nothing has happened, this feels like an insult to the players still in the game. Yes, the players on Edge of Extinction are technically “still in the game” by the show’s definition, but they’re clearly not fully “in the game” either. Why do they deserve the special treatment? Because they’re legends? Perhaps, but wasn’t the point of the Edge of Extinction to test people’s limits? To see how much pain and suffering they were willing to endure, just for a SHOT at returning? Kind of undermines your point, doesn’t it? How is this suffering?

Like with the loved ones of the players still in the game, few specific reunions are worth mentioning. All are nice and heartwarming in their own way, and it’s always nice to see that even the most despicable of players are still people who have other people who love them. One tiny detail I find hilarious, though, is that this reunion underlines just how little CBS cares about people from “Survivor Samoa” not named Russell Hantz. Parvati’s husband, John Fincher, was a contestant on that season, but did he get a mention as a previous player? No! And it’s not like no one else who played before didn’t either! Rachel, Tyson’s wife, got a specific call-out, and she didn’t even make the merge! She’s undateable! Hell, I don’t think they even showed us a full shot of John’s face. Every shot was him snogging Parvati. Way to respect your previous players, show!

Ok, we’ve had our touchy-feeley stuff, on to actual strategy, right? Nope, challenge time! Our immunity challenge today comes courtesy of “Survivor Blood vs. Water”, though as Probst notes, this specific iteration resembles the one used on “Survivor Kaoh Rong”. Players stack blocks to spell “Immunity” with the catch being that they must balance the board said blocks are on while moving back and forth to collect their subsequent blocks. Not a bad challenge, but a bit overdone at this point, especially since it hasn’t really innovated since “Survivor Kaoh Rong”. Still, we’ve had worse, it’s not REALLY an endurance challenge, and it can work really well if there’s a lot of back and forth. Sadly, there ISN’T a lot of back and forth. There’s a few close competitors, but Tony does well in the challenge from beginning to end, and it’s mostly a matter of just seeing who comes close before Tony gets his first individual immunity victory, and two fire tokens to boot. Congratulations, Tony. You are now tied with Kass McQuillen (“Survivor Cagayan”) in terms of number of immunity wins. May you one day be as awesome as she is.

While I may gripe about the immunity challenge, Tony is kind of an odd one to win this one. After all, this sort of challenge favors those with patience and finesse, neither of which are qualities Tony is particularly known for. Even he is surprised, but he isn’t complaining. After all, he is the belle of the ball. First to come up to him his Jeremy, who pitches voting out Sarah, on the grounds that he wants to break up the Sarah/Sophie bond. Not a bad idea in general, but why, Jeremy, are you pitching this idea to TONY? And if you must pitch the idea to Tony, why say Sarah. Even if you don’t know the two are allied, you can guess that they have something of a bond, given that they played two seasons together. If you must go for one of them, go for Sophie. Tony clearly isn’t happy about it, but lets it slide to Jeremy’s face. All is not well with Tony and Sarah, however. Tony, who had been so patient so far this episode, loses it with Sarah when they can’t agree on their target. Both make logical points. Sarah wants to target Kim since she’s the type who can fly under the radar and snake you before you know it, while Tony wants to target Tyson. The reasons aren’t given, but Tyson is a challenge threat, and these people have seen “Survivor Edge of Extinction”. They know not to let any returnees from there near the finals. Thus, to paraphrase an old Klingon Proverb, any day is a good day to vote out Tyson.

Sarah seems to win the initial struggle, with Tony caving, but Tony isn’t done yet, as indicted by the hornets swarming overhead. When Jeremy gets up from a pow-wow with Nick and Tony to go talk to Kim, Tony calls over Sophie and uses the time to talk about going against Jeremy. Again, another good target. Jeremy has bonds with a lot of people left, and is a challenge threat, combining to make him dangerous. The trouble is, they only seem to have five, and need to pull over a sixth. This may be difficult, though, as Kim, Jeremy, and Tyson commiserate about no one wanting to talk to them. Then they get the bright idea of “Hey, why don’t we talk with each other!”, and agree to pull in Denise and Michele (presumably through their ties to Jeremy) to vote out Sophie, on the logical grounds of “she’s unlikely to see it coming”. Yes, the strategy is rushed, and pointless crammed into all of about 10 minutes, but it is logical strategy, if nothing else. One interesting point about these groups is that we’ve still very much got an original Dakal/original Sele split here, just with a few disaffected people switching sides. Most Dakal still in the game are with Tony (Sarah, Nick, and Sophie). Ben is original Sele, but was the swing vote there with no truly firm alliances. Most original Sele, meanwhile, are with Jeremy (Denise and Michele), along with Kim, who had no real alliance, and Tyson, who got voted out by Dakal, and thus has no reason to be loyal to them. Funny. Despite the tribe shake-up, we still end up with an original tribe split, effectively. Whodathunkit?

If you can do math, though, you’ll notice that this leaves us at a 5-5 tie, with no way to break the deadlock using social play. This also means, once again, we must forgo the “Which person is better to vote out?” discussion, since there’s no swing vote. Plus, again, this is a situation where all the targets are logical ones, and so there’s really no wrong answer. With no other recourse, we turn to the discussion of advantages. First is Kim’s idol, which she considers playing, though she tells Denise she wants to play it on someone else, rather than herself. I just have to ask: WHY? Kim, maybe you haven’t been keeping up with the show as much as you should have, but it’s not WHO you play the idol on, but HOW. Playing it correctly, for yourself or someone else, is all that matters. With this much potential risk, best to play it on yourself if you play it at all, and hope for the best. Potentially more impactful is Jeremy’s “Safety without Power”, since tonight is the last night he can play it. With so much chaos, it might seem a wise move, but when Jeremy pitches it to Tyson, it’s pointed out that this basically screws his alliance, and Jeremy’s firefighter “help other people” instincts fight with his self-preservation instinct as we head off to Tribal Council.

For those who say that idols and advantages should be gotten rid of entirely, let this Tribal Council be the counterargument. This was a SNOOZEFEST of a Tribal Council until the advantages came out. We cut straight to the whispering, with no inciting incident. It adds an air of mystery, I suppose, but that’s what the strategic buildup pre-Tribal Council is for. We get no drama until Jeremy and Sarah talk over each other to play their advantages, only to each insist the other go first, get into a standoff, and nearly get to voting AGAIN before finally something gives. That something is Jeremy, who goes for self-preservation and plays his safety without power on himself. I can’t really fault the decision too much. While this does all but guarantee that a member of Jeremy’s alliance will be voted out, all this does is make his way forward more difficult. Better a difficult way forward than a near impossible way forward from getting voted out. Jeremy leaves, and our groups, called out by Sophie in a very Boston Rob-esque move, convene to decide on their targets. You would think Jeremy’s advantage would be it, but NO! Despite having a numerical advantage, Sarah still plays her vote steal. I’ll admit, my gut reaction was that Sarah jumped the gun, but then it occurred to me that this makes mathematical sense. By stealing a vote, and turning a probable 5-4 vote into a probably 6-3 vote, Sarah’s alliance can split the votes and virtually guarantee themselves success. After all, the one thing that can upset their alliance is a correct idol play. Given that Sarah knows the location of the Yara idol, and that the Sele one was played by Denise, it’s unlikely the other alliance has more than one idol. Thus, by splitting the votes 3-3-3, even if one person from the other alliance is safe, the other goes home on revote. It’s genius…

Or at least it WOULD be if the group had done it correctly! Seriously, how did you screw such a simple plan up? Tyson isn’t even involved this time! Ok, he is involved, but on the other side, so that’s no excuse. Kim plays her idol on a vote-stolen Denise, which given how obvious a target it made her, I’m surprised Kim went for her. I can only assume it was more emotional than strategic. To be fair, from what we see, Denise does receive two votes, but Tyson gets the remaining four. This implies the majority did a 4-2 split AGAINST A GROUP OF THREE PEOPLE! WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? If Kim had played her idol correctly, Sophie would have been gone, and you would have been SOL. You ever think of that?

Sigh. Ok, ok, let’s talk about Tyson’s exit. As I said before, it was earned, and I’m happy to see the ruling alliance make a smart decision. Of course, I also said I was warming up to Tyson and his humor a lot more this episode, so am I sorry to see him go? Yeah… no. Look, I’m liking the guy more than I have, but he’s still not one of my favorites, even of those left. Plus, if nothing else, it’s gratifying to see people in the game FINALLY not let the returnee from Edge of Extinction get a foothold. Having no fire tokens, Tyson merely gives the boxes the finger, and we close on a group hug from the jury to Probst. Aww.

This is a tough episode of “Survivor” to critique, mainly because it’s really only half an episode of “Survivor”. The first half was just Hallmark-Channel sweetness, which is nice enough, and I do like to see the show shake up their own formula. But it just didn’t feel like “Survivor” as we know it. What we did get was rushed, due to loved ones and the Edge of Extinction, continuing the major issue of this season. While the characters and strategy are good, there’s just too much left, and there isn’t enough time to properly digest everything before we move on, making it all feel rushed, which should not happen in a legends season. Still, it’s by no means bad overall. Just room for improvement.

Speaking of improvement, we’ve got a tricky title to identify today, so get cracking. Let me know in the comments who said the quote that provided tonight’s blog title, as well as what season it was said on! First person to get it correct gets their name at the top of the next blog!

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.

Idol Speculation: “Survivor Winners at War” Episode 9: Gotta Be Like Ice

I guess, if we have no one to praise for correctly identifying last week’s quote, we can talk about the new tribe name, since I failed to do so. “Koru” is not a bad name, though a bit on the short side. We’re not doing as bad as back in the day, when it was NOTHING but four-letter names for a while, but this one does manage to not sound similar to any previous tribe name, at least. It does sound similar to the character of Tohru from “Jackie Chan Adventures”, but as I’m probably the only “Survivor” fan who has ever watched that show, it would only bother me.

Getting back from Tribal Council, it’s safe to say that people are not happy. Michele in particular is not happy, and in telling us that she is not happy, we see that the crowdedness of last episode has even spilled over into this one. Michele, you see, references a plot line we DID NOT SEE AT ALL IN THE PAST EPISODE. She talks about how mad she is when she said she was ok with Wendell going, yet was left out anyway. Um, did I miss something? Yeah, Michele talked about not liking Wendell when they first ended up on a tribe together, but the most recent narrative was how she had wasted a fire token on him, and how bonded they were. Where did this come from? Now, you might charitably say that Michele was simply playing that up to the players, to help make her anger come off as righteous indignation, as well as imply her free-agent status. This argument would make sense, were it not for the fact that she was saying this in confessional. You know, when ONLY talking to the camera? Unless she’s pulling a Danni Boatwright, why lie to the camera? And about this of all things?

Michele is not alone in being pissed, however. Nick, of course, is quite upset as well, telling us that there’s a storm brewing. I wouldn’t bring up this line specifically, were it not for a bit of meta it creates for me. You see, there happens to be a tornado advisory in my area, which a crawl started for as soon as Nick started talking about the storm coming. There’s no way that was coordinated, and it’s comedy gold! Sorry to all of you who didn’t have potentially life-threatening weather in your area. To add insult to injury, Nick tells us he was blindsided on his birthday, which I’m sure will in NO WAY come back to become a plot point later in the episode.

To contrast with the anger, we have Adam, who is naturally thrilled to have made it through Tribal Council. Unfortunately for Adam, this is an odd-numbered episode, meaning he has to look like an idiot. However, it seems Adam may be limited to just grammatical and pronunciation matters, as his first big error is misusing the word “literally”. Unless you’re having open-heart surgery, your heart is never “literally” beating out of your chest. That said, Adam does tell Michele of a bit of a good idea of his. I haven’t drawn much attention to it, but Adam has been searching the Tribal Council voting booth for an idol pretty much every time we see him vote, and as someone who’s advocated for that twist for a while, I can’t help but approve. Adam has turned up empty, but noticed a fleur-de-lis on Probst’s pedestal. Remembering that Denise’s idol was a fleur-de-lis, Adam thinks maybe it might be an idol. I think it might just be a recurring symbol, but hey, I’ve heard weirder theories on “Survivor”, and kudos to Adam for thinking outside the box. Adam does lose points for pronunciation, though. The “s” is silent in fleur-de-lis.

Speaking of thinking outside the box, we cut over to the Edge of Extinction. Joy. Yul returns with a tiny pizza… Er, I mean, yet another clue to a fire token earning opportunity. The clue tells the players to take a step back and remember history. Most everyone concludes that they must look in a place where they found fire tokens before, and hikes up the mountain. Why Natalie doesn’t immediately ditch everyone and run for the water well, since only she knows that it’s there, I can’t say. Natalie does have the bright idea of suggesting they split up at the top, so as to keep Yul and Wendell, who don’t know any place the group has been so far, from finding any tokens. Not that it does her much good, of course. It’s Danni and Parvati who have the brainwave to think back to “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, and look in a memorable hiding place there. Thus, they remember Aubry’s find in a hole in the rock, and so look there, finding a “50/50” advantage, basically a coin flip that either grants you immunity or doesn’t. They agree to sell it to Michele, since she has the most fire tokens, and they can also probably guess that she’s on the outs, and in need of something to keep her in the game. But who gets to receive said fire tokens? Parvati found the actual advantage, but Danni was right there, and was the one with the brainwave about finding the clue? The point is moot! Parvati states her intention to use the fire tokens to get food for everyone there, and even tells them about finding the advantage. Parvati, what happened? Don’t get me wrong, I’m enjoying seeing a different side of you, but this all feels like it really came out of nowhere! What happened to the Parvati of old?

As to this method of hiding it, you might think that I’d hate it. There are several reasons to, after all. Reusing an old hiding place, while clever for an anniversary season, just shows the weakness in staying in Fiji (fans of the show can remember where previous advantages were hidden, and look there). Plus, there was no guarantee that someone would remember this. No winner past “Survivor David vs. Goliath” is on this season, and “Survivor Edge of Extinction” itself is not exactly a memorable season. On top of that, while I get wanting to honor the show’s past, you should not honor “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, due to overall being pointless and, in my opinion, the worst season the show has ever had. If it fades into non-existence (with the exception of Aubry, Rick Devans, and Wendy) I will be content. So yeah, I should hate this. But I don’t. Why? Because Aubry got mentioned in a positive light on the 20th anniversary season of the show, and that’s a high even Edge of Extinction can’t bring me down from.

Continuing on the “tangentially related to Aubry” train, our reward challenge comes from her first season “Survivor Kaoh Rong”. Three members of a team of five must transport a net of heavy wooden fish to shore, hook them to a pole, and transport to a table, where the two remaining players must them put them in a table puzzle. Not a bad challenge at all, and certainly not overused. That said, my usual complaint about team challenges post-merge stands, especially when our sit-out doesn’t even get a chance at reward. What is our reward? Chinese take-out. Nothing special, but I suppose when you’re starving on an island, food is food.

On paper, this should be a lopsided competition. Our red team is Jeremy, Nick, Adam, Tony, and Tyson, while our blue team is Michele, Sophie, Kim, Sarah, and Ben. While these types of challenges usually come down to the puzzle, each time has one puzzle whiz, so you’d think the challenge would come down to strength, which it kind of does, since our early lead team does win. And you’d think the red team would have the edge there, having four challenge beasts compared to one. There’s almost no way they could lose. So, I have to ask: WHY IN GOD’S NAME DID YOU PUT ADAM ON THE STRENGTH PORTION OF THE CHALLENGE? HE’S FAR AND AWAY THE WEAKEST PERSON LEFT PHYSICALLY, AND ALL HIS STRENGTH LIES IN PUZZLES! Either Jeremy or Nick our two puzzle solvers, would have been WAY better served helping on this portion of the challenge.

Sure enough, red struggles, and blue wins reward. Before Probst can send them off, though, Sarah asks if she can give it up. Probst agrees, knowing the drama this can create, and Sarah gives the reward to Nick. It is his birthday after all…

Sorry, I had to check my phone there. Just got a news alert. It seems the city of Boston, MA, has exploded. Experts aren’t sure why, as the only clue is that the epicenter is the home of one Rodney Lavoie Jr., contestant on “Survivor Worlds Apart”. Bizarre.

Anyway, this might seem like a nice gesture, but this is Sarah Lacina we’re talking about here. The criminal of “Survivor Game Changers”. Literally the person most people wanted out pre-game. There’s no way it’s that simple. There must be some ulterior motive.

SARAH: I just wanted to do something nice and emotional. There was no gameplay involved.

Well ok, then. Apparently this is just the episode where all the ruthless women show their softer side. That said, just because there was no gameplay involved doesn’t mean people won’t believe there is. Adam points out how big of a threat this makes her. Jeremy reminds us that this is what got him eliminated on “Survivor San Juan del Sur”. Even TONY talks about how dumb of a move this was, and when TONY is the one telling your your move was stupid, you know you done goofed.

With that, though, I would like to point out how good a job Tony and Sarah are doing at keeping their relationship under wraps. On a season where any pre-existing pairs have been snuffed out as soon as they’re noted, it’s pretty impressive that they’ve managed to stay strong and avoid being targeted, by and large. Those times when they have been targeted, it’s for entirely different reasons. It shows the strategic chops these pair have. And the best part. The show doesn’t hit us over the head with this information, but instead trusts the viewer to pay attention, and lets it sink in without narration. More of this, please!

After a humanizing moment with our reward winners, we must get back to what Probst believes “Survivor” is all about: Idols and Advantages. Our feasters look high and low, even going so far as to bust open their fortune cookies to find a clue. No such luck, though I did appreciate the “look under the bottoms of the cartons” maneuver. With no idols or advantages there, we instead turn to Michele, who now has to decide whether or not to buy the “50/50” advantage. Ok, since we’re here, let’s talk about this advantage. Put simply, it’s dumb. The rules on it aren’t exceptionally clear. “Safe” means you effectively have immunity, but “Not Safe” is not well-explained. Is it like losing a challenge on “Island of the Idols” where you lose your vote? If so, then it’s a TERRIBLE advantage. Very expensive (four fire tokens!) for only a SHOT at payoff, and a big loss if you don’t. Even if it just does nothing, however, it’s still a bad deal. People have paid less for GUARANTEED safety. Even with Michele in this position, why go for this? Because a fortune cookie told her to. Look, Michele. I like you. Even as the head of the “Aubry Lobby”, I like you. You seem like a lot of fun to hang with, and you played a solid game last time. I may prefer Aubry, but no disrespect to you. You are a very worthy winner. That said, THIS IS A HORRIBLE DEAL, AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD FOR MAKING IT!

Our immunity challenge today comes courtesy of “Survivor Caramoan”. Basically, everyone has to balance on increasingly small parts of a triangular prism, with the last one standing being the victory. We sadly do not get the positive callback to Andrea and Brenda’s impromptu rule change, though we do get the positive of a few particularly wild players trying to keep their balance. Jeremy’s theatrics and Ben’s “kung-fu” moves in particular need to be praised. Also, I should say that I’m impressed with Ben. I thought he’d be out early, since this sort of challenge does not favor the top-heavy. Jeremy can attest to that. Second place is impressive, though. That said, this challenge does have a couple of bad points. Once again, a fire token is granted to the winner, and we again get rock music with lyrics of the challenge, rather than the more traditional music the show has. I expressed my disdain for these creative choices last episode, and am sad to see they don’t seem to be a one-off thing. However, since I already talked about my hatred for these choices recently, I’ll spare you the rant again, and thus cut to Kim winning immunity. A well-earned victory, but not an impactful one.

At first, the vote seems like it’s going to be simple and straightforward. Nick and Michele are on the outs? Split the vote between Nick and Michele, with Nick being the primary choice for being “untrustworthy”. Adam gets thrown out as the alternate split vote in place of Michele, but that gets dismissed very quickly. But then Nick, sensing that everything is going against him, decides to stir things up. He tells Tyson that his name is getting thrown out. It may be. After all, he is they guy back from the Edge of Extinction, and while I don’t expect most people to remember “Survivor Edge of Extinction”, the fact that the winner came from there is something I would hope they remember, and take to heart when deciding how to treat returnees from the Edge of Extinction. Thus, it wouldn’t surprise me if Tyson had been thrown out as a possible boot, but we haven’t heard about it. This gets Tyson to toss Sarah’s name out, who tosses Adam out again, who tosses out Ben’s name, and then all hell breaks loose. Names being thrown around left and right. Tyson even gets his name thrown out for really real this time. It’s pretty much pure chaos as we head to Tribal Council, meaning my usual “This is who’s being decided between; here’s the right move for the swing votes” format goes out the window.

What I can talk about, however, is one little moment that nearly escaped being seen. You see, for the most part the people we see talking are the groups you’d expect. Jeremy, Tony, and Tyson. Sarah and Sophie. Ben and Adam even get together and do their “odd-couple schtick”, where Ben tries to call Adam on throwing out his name, which Adam does a poor job of denying. But one that almost escapes notice is Kim and Denise. We’d seen them talk on the second iteration of Dakal, but nothing much concrete. Here, however, when everyone else is panicking, they stay calm and debate the pros and cons of going for Sarah (Kim says she’s ok, and we immediately cut to her saying to Ben that Sarah can’t go. This to me says they’re playing smarter than most everyone left. My favorite player still in the game, and the most dominant winner ever teaming up? I love it.

With so much misdirection (though given their airtime earlier in the episode, Adam and Sarah seem to be the main people set up for elimination), all Tribal Council really needs to do is keep the chaos going. That it does, with all pretense thrown out the window, and Tribal Council turns into a whisper-fest, though somewhat more justified than other examples. The producers did nothing to elicit this. This is just everyone being crazy. It’s only Adam and Ben arguing about how they talk to each other once again that gets everyone to pay attention. We’re reminded here that Adam is his own worst enemy. While I don’t doubt that he was targeted before Tribal Council, when he kept being paranoid about straight answers, and continuing to make it an issue when he could just let it die, he really did himself no favors. As such, it’s not a surprise when Adam gets the votes, but the rest of the episode was enough of a mystery, and the reasoning behind his leaving clear, that one can’t help but be satisfied. Adam clearly demonstrated, through his paranoia at Tribal Council, that he had crossed the “Shamar Threshold”, first seen on “Survivor Caramoan”. His chaotic paranoia now made him more a hinderance than a help as an ally.

Did that paranoia pay off, though? Did Adam correctly pick out an at-Tribal Council Immunity Idol? It would seem not, as Adam is unable to wrest it from the podium. Probst takes pity and lets him declare it an idol for himself anyway, before revealing that it is, in fact, just set decoration. To everyone’s credit, apart from a bit of mockery at Adam’s attempts to pull off the fleur-de-lis, no one really thinks it a bad idea. It’s plausible, and as Adam says, worth a try. Even Probst is respectful when snuffing Adam’s torch.

In case it wasn’t obvious, this episode is head and shoulders an improvement over the previous one. There was still some crowding, but we got good emotional moments, three-dimensional characters, even some solid misdirection in there. I still think this season is trying to do too much, but it did that much better this episode than the previous one.

So now, as we await your next episode, I await your next guess. Which US contestant said this quote, and on what season? Adding in episode number is not necessary, but earns your brownie points if you get it! First person to get it correct gets their name at the top of the next blog!

-Matt

Title Credit to Jean Storrs.